If it was realisitic...

If it was realisitic...

Postby ezz » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:23 am

Would you approve us paying for Artell back in january?
Get over it ;)
ezz
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:56 pm
Location: Morecambe

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby marky » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:25 am

No
Some are dead and some are living. In my life, I've loved them all.
marky
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby P/T Indie » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:47 am

Only to play him up front :o

Crewe wouldn't sell him as he is one of their best players, captain and on a 2 year deal.

Was meant to reply to CC's thread about Crewe's strikers going out on loan they prob don't get a look in cos Artell is scoring all the time :lol:
Eintracht Branschweigs answer to Shrimps Voices

http://eintracht-demo.forumieren.com/index.htm

For a great footballing day out
P/T Indie
 
Posts: 3811
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby heysham_mfc » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:06 am

No
heysham_mfc
 
Posts: 5320
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:22 pm
Location: Heysham

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby rickster » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:21 am

yes more solid then what we got at the moment apart from parrish. he also can score goals he scores nearly a goal every other game.
rickster
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Heysham_Shrimp » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:29 am

ezz wrote:Would you approve us paying for Artell back in january?



Difficult one that.

I wish we had retained him but we didn't.

I think McCready and Parrish are better and more mobile defenders but neither are likely to weigh in with 9 goals at the other end. Hopefully they will prevent more goals than Arts may have scored so on the balance probably no.

Our main problem in defence is finding a fast strong tough-tackling right back who can overlap and deliver good crosses. Now if Yates was available........ :?:
"They will be dancing in the streets of Total Network Solutions tonight" - Jeff Stelling
User avatar
Heysham_Shrimp
 
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:47 am

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby ezz » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:10 pm

Interesting, I always thought he was pretty solid at the back as well. Mainly his distribution skills people moaned about.
Personally the answer to my question is yes, obviously not a lot of money but i'd have him back in a heart beat.

moose
Get over it ;)
ezz
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:56 pm
Location: Morecambe

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby steve mfc » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:37 pm

Yes and play him alongside McCready and move Parrish to right back.
steve mfc
 
Posts: 1837
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:20 pm

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby George Dawes » Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:17 pm

i would have him back but no i wouldn't pay for him.
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby George Dawes » Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:20 pm

if it was realistic would you have Rene Howe back ?

i would.
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Christies Child » Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:23 pm

Most definaely NOT.

Good for clearing into Row Z but otherwise his distribution was awful.

ALL money available should be spent on bringing in a hungry striker or even somebody on loan from a Premiership club such as Everton.... ;)
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Sammy h » Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:37 pm

Funny how everyone has said no, but in previous posts have sung his praises and said they want him back?

Just for his sheer aerial presence I would say YES.
User avatar
Sammy h
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:25 pm
Location: Lancaster

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby George Dawes » Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:41 pm

Sammy h wrote:Funny how everyone has said no, but in previous posts have sung his praises and said they want him back?

Just for his sheer aerial presence I would say YES.



but would you pay a transfer fee for him?

when we have little money as it is and desperately need to attract a quality all-round striker what can both use his feet and head and run with the ball unlike what we have now ?
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Sammy h » Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:57 pm

DawZi wrote:
Sammy h wrote:Funny how everyone has said no, but in previous posts have sung his praises and said they want him back?

Just for his sheer aerial presence I would say YES.



but would you pay a transfer fee for him?

when we have little money as it is and desperately need to attract a quality all-round striker what can both use his feet and head and run with the ball unlike what we have now ?



Didn't read the initial post properly. As cc said. If we do have any money, it should be spent on a striker.

Top of the list has to be a striker, I wouldn't be surprised if one comes in on loan..maybe from a north west Liverpudlian club?? ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
User avatar
Sammy h
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:25 pm
Location: Lancaster

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Bare Ben » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:05 am

I think its well known that we are bringing in a striker on loan from a blue shirted premier league team who play at Goodison Park and are nicknamed the Toffees, but I can't confirm anything. I'm positively unsure, adamantly confused. Either it will happen or it won't, but it definitely will. YW
User avatar
Bare Ben
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:26 pm

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Caged Lion » Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:04 am

ezz wrote:Would you approve us paying for Artell back in january?


No chance, our central defenders are good enough, we need a right back

Nor would I approve having Ronaldo Howe back

Bring on the toffee nosed redeemer :?
User avatar
Caged Lion
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:32 pm

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby ezz » Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:44 am

Moose would score more than any striker we sign anyway :lol:
Get over it ;)
ezz
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:56 pm
Location: Morecambe

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby seasonsinthesun » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:11 pm

Can anyone offer a reason why a specialist right full back is allowed to leave which means we are left with a midfield player playing right back or a centre back playing right back?
Totally mystifying.
Coates Pearson Street Baldwin Bennett Sutton Done Roberts Kershaw Webber Richmond Galley - Shrimps '74 Legends
seasonsinthesun
 
Posts: 1786
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: Preston

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Pobble » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:22 pm

seasonsinthesun wrote:Can anyone offer a reason why a specialist right full back is allowed to leave which means we are left with a midfield player playing right back or a centre back playing right back?
Totally mystifying.

This would not happen with a proper Manager in charge. !
Pobble
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:55 pm

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Morectalk » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:22 pm

Rene Howe was very good when he could be arsed - the goal against Bradford for example. Problem was, he didn't do that sort of thing too often.
User avatar
Morectalk
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:36 pm

Re: If it was realisitic...

Postby Harry » Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:25 pm

seasonsinthesun wrote:Can anyone offer a reason why a specialist right full back is allowed to leave which means we are left with a midfield player playing right back or a centre back playing right back?
Totally mystifying.


Darren Moss is worse at right back that Garry Hunter or Andy Parrish.
User avatar
Harry
 
Posts: 1343
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: Lancaster


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests