Heysham_Shrimp wrote:I was under the impression that the league rules were that a ground had to have a minimum of 2,000 seats.
The plans suggest 1,898.
Anyone offer an answer to this ?
marky wrote:I thought it was a percentage of overall capacity?
Where such Club remains a Member of The League that Club shall have until 1st May in
the third Season from the date of its admission to comply with the requirement to achieve a
capacity in accordance with the Membership Criteria.
marky wrote:MikeB wrote:Oh please do not sell the name of the ground to someone who flashes a cheque at the club. I really hate that. Called one thing for a couple of seasons and then something else for another two etc. I guess it should be called Westgate? Does anyone ever use the sponsors name anyway? I certainly don't.
Well the Reebok Stadium is the Reebok Stadium. The Ricoh Arena is similar. Usually, it depends on how the sponsor's name is used. I don't like it per se, but stadium sponsorship is increasingly becoming a very lucritive way for a club to get some much needed capital. We need to make money out of this new stadium, don't forget. That's what it's al about (that and Christie Park fast becoming unfit for purpose).
campdave wrote:marky wrote:I thought it was a percentage of overall capacity?
Min of 2000 seats by 3rd season in the league according to:
http://www.football-league.co.uk/static ... 386,00.pdf
PUNKISDEAD wrote:A nice big stand at christie park on the car wash end with good facilities for players, corporate people, & fans wo like to watch from the halfway line , is a sensible idea as apposed to the pie in the sky stadium.
Christies Child wrote:How many times does it need repeating...
...I could go on, but you get my drift PUNKISDEAD?
???? wrote: As someone who has probably annoyed a lot on SV's during my time, I've tried always to respect the opinion of others, despite wanting to have 'a right go' in retaliation.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], captain sparkle, marky No.1 and 97 guests