essex_shrimp wrote:Hunter was the best he was awesome in the first half
Sharpy wrote:every time he did win the ball he gave it straight back to chesterfield! kept flicking the ball forward into the middle of the pitch, to the exact place he should have been. whenever Shuker brought the ball forward he had no one to give it too because muggins had dropped deeper and was to slow to get back!
essex_shrimp wrote:Hunter was the best he was awesome in the first half
MfcChris wrote:essex_shrimp wrote:Hunter was the best he was awesome in the first half
Got to agree. He seems to enjoy it in defence .Stanley and Hunter are our best players and they were with the squad when we came up!!
Matty the Shrimp wrote:Mullin, Duffy, Drummond. In that order, never seen Drummond play that well for a long time.
DawZi wrote:Mullin's presence was a absolute nuisance, i just think he needs his mate(Jevons) to play off him
but for me Duffy or Haining for MoM
DawZi wrote:Mullin's presence was a absolute nuisance, i just think he needs his mate(Jevons) to play off him
but for me Duffy or Haining for MoM
Matty the Shrimp wrote:Chesterfield fans seem to think Shuker was very good, and i would say he was the ebst we have seen him, i'd play him in that role just behind Mullin again, worked very well
Posh wrote:Matty the Shrimp wrote:Chesterfield fans seem to think Shuker was very good, and i would say he was the ebst we have seen him, i'd play him in that role just behind Mullin again, worked very well
It's weird how people see the game so differently. I thought Shuker was poor as a striker, got the odd knock down from Mulls but did little with it bar a 1-2 when he was brought down. Spencer came on and was a real handful and actually gave their centre backs something to think about. He's tall, strong and has pace, pretty much everything Shuker didn't have.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 24 guests