BBC

BBC

Postby Posh » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:24 pm

Do they know something everyone else doesn't?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 853856.stm

Note the words Man City in the URL and next to the article.
VIVE LA REVOLUTION!
User avatar
Posh
 
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Everywhere and nowhere baby

Re: BBC

Postby Morectalk » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:30 pm

I think Torres may well surprise everyone & stay, but it looks like Masc...Mashc...Masher...the Argentina capatin could well be off to Inter.
User avatar
Morectalk
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:36 pm

Re: BBC

Postby Bare Ben » Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:12 pm

It wouldn't be a surprise to me. :ugeek:
User avatar
Bare Ben
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:26 pm

Re: BBC

Postby Opinionated » Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:19 pm

I think they would benefit from selling Torres for the right price. If they can get about £60 million for him it would be worthwhile. They could then buy 4 or 5 very good Premier League players. Tottenham got 4th without any world class players, but they do have a strong all round squad. Liverpool could benefit from a similar set up. Having said that they shouldn't stand a chance of getting 4th due to Man City's spending spree.
'Patience is key in football' - Darren Lock
Opinionated
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 3:26 pm
Location: Within sight of the Globe Arena floodlights

Re: BBC

Postby Sammy h » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:12 pm

Opinionated wrote:I think they would benefit from selling Torres for the right price. If they can get about £60 million for him it would be worthwhile. They could then buy 4 or 5 very good Premier League players. Tottenham got 4th without any world class players, but they do have a strong all round squad. Liverpool could benefit from a similar set up. Having said that they shouldn't stand a chance of getting 4th due to Man City's spending spree.



60 million? :lol: The lad has just flopped on the world stage. Did Barca not just get Villa for 45 million? They will be lucky to get 30 million for him.

He has to stay as he wont be able to pass a medical anyway :lol:
User avatar
Sammy h
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:25 pm
Location: Lancaster

Re: BBC

Postby Opinionated » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:23 pm

Sammy h wrote:
Opinionated wrote:I think they would benefit from selling Torres for the right price. If they can get about £60 million for him it would be worthwhile. They could then buy 4 or 5 very good Premier League players. Tottenham got 4th without any world class players, but they do have a strong all round squad. Liverpool could benefit from a similar set up. Having said that they shouldn't stand a chance of getting 4th due to Man City's spending spree.



60 million? :lol: The lad has just flopped on the world stage. Did Barca not just get Villa for 45 million? They will be lucky to get 30 million for him.

He has to stay as he wont be able to pass a medical anyway :lol:


Yeah but City will have to pay over the odds because clubs know how much money they have. Also Ronaldo went for £80 million and in my opinion Torres is just as good. Villa was a bargain at £45 million. Not a bad signing for a club that are £370 million in debt!
'Patience is key in football' - Darren Lock
Opinionated
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 3:26 pm
Location: Within sight of the Globe Arena floodlights

Re: BBC

Postby Bare Ben » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:27 pm

Liverpool put a £70 Million price tag on him so I think they would take 60 8-)
User avatar
Bare Ben
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:26 pm

Re: BBC

Postby NeilG » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:09 pm

Villa was a bargain at £45 million


I've had a few bargains in my time but non came anywhere near to shelling out £45 million for something that would be knackered in 10 years :lol: :lol:
NeilG
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: BBC

Postby marky No.1 » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:16 pm

I thought that then along came the wife! :lol: :lol:
Enjoy yourself.... It is later than you think
User avatar
marky No.1
 
Posts: 22126
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Carnforth

Re: BBC

Postby Bare Ben » Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:31 pm

NeilG wrote:
Villa was a bargain at £45 million


I've had a few bargains in my time but non came anywhere near to shelling out £45 million for something that would be knackered in 10 years :lol: :lol:


I thought he was on about Aston Villa! :shock:
User avatar
Bare Ben
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:26 pm


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 84 guests