O/T BURKA

by **Curly** » Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:02 pm

Keith wrote:
Peter wrote:
Mark S wrote:Now you are talking!

Ban the Toupe!

darrenlock wears a toupe

yes but he was talking about his "two piece running kit".

Ban the toupe and ban Curly from going out of his house unless wearing a burqa? We could be on to something here! First part of the manifesto comes together for the Baz's Numpty Party at the next election!

Would I be able to get a Morecambe FC one, in red?
Ok, you can take away my rights then.

by **shrimpnsave** » Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:21 pm

perhaps (health and safety) should get involved

by **Plain Peter** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:07 am

Bump

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/matt/

by **casey jones** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:21 pm

what is to stop, for example, female customs officers taking burka wearers into a side room to check that the wearers are who they claim to be? This cannot upset the male of their species as there would be no male involvement.

by **Plain Peter** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:08 pm

casey jones wrote:what is to stop, for example, female customs officers taking burka wearers into a side room to check that the wearers are who they claim to be? This cannot upset the male of their species as there would be no male involvement.

What would happen if the passport photograph showed the bearer wearing a burqa/niqab?
You could just see the Immigration Officer saying "I'm sorry madam, but your face doesn't reflect that on your passport photograph. On the table over there is a selection of masks. If you can fing one one that matches the photograph then you're in!"

by **Keith** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:03 pm

casey jones wrote:what is to stop, for example, female customs officers taking burka wearers into a side room to check that the wearers are who they claim to be? This cannot upset the male of their species as there would be no male involvement.

which is what happens

Peter wrote:What would happen if the passport photograph showed the bearer wearing a burqa/niqab?

which (as I'm sure you know :roll:

) can't happen

http://www.ips.gov.uk/cps/rde/xchg/ips_ ... xsl/36.htm

Hats or head coverings are not permitted except when worn for religious reasons and only if the full facial features are clearly visible

by **morecambe mick** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:15 pm

Do other countries have the same rules as us Keith?

With regards to passport photos? I mean if, for example, another country allowed "photos" with the face covered what would be the pointg in lifting the covering?

I did like that photo you sent Keith, did you take it? :lol:

by **Keith** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:35 pm

morecambe mick wrote:I did like that photo you sent Keith, did you take it?

I think *that* would have got me a slap! :lol:

by **shrimpnsave** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:30 pm

hands up all of you...

Who trusts a hoody that walks down your street

he or she could have no malice but simply sheltering from the rain.....

honest answers only.....

or around callander caravans :lol:

by **Plain Peter** » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:57 am

casey jones wrote:what is to stop, for example, female customs officers taking burka wearers into a side room to check that the wearers are who they claim to be? This cannot upset the male of their species as there would be no male involvement.

Keith wrote:which is what happens
Peter wrote: "What would happen if the passport photograph showed the bearer wearing a burqa/niqab?"
which (as I'm sure you know ) can't happen

Thing is though Keith, if the said female had got to where casey jones suggests, ie the female customs officer, then it'd be too late because she'd already cleared Immigration, who were presumably happy with her mug-shot :lol: