O/T BURKA

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby shrimpnsave » Sat Jul 17, 2010 7:07 pm

Mixed opinion here but i tend to agree with dawzi.........

The burka is a repressive and backward relic which should be banned from the UK too.

All the excuses of cultural diversity won't wash. (And BTW, should we accept "cultural diversity" as an excuse for female genital mutilation, 'honour killings' or any other 'quaint traditional customs' from mediaeval times?).
football is a funny old game
User avatar
shrimpnsave
 
Posts: 6311
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:21 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Plain Peter » Sat Jul 17, 2010 7:15 pm

shrimpnsave wrote:Mixed opinion here but i tend to agree with dawzi.........

The burka is a repressive and backward relic which should be banned from the UK too.


By simply banning the burqa/niqab, you will be imprisoning the poor women who wear the damn thing to a life behind closed-doors, FOREVER.
The women, like it or lump it, will have no say in the matter.
Is that what you want?
Plain Peter
 

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby bigreddog » Sat Jul 17, 2010 7:24 pm

shrimpnsave wrote:Mixed opinion here but i tend to agree with dawzi.........

The burka is a repressive and backward relic which should be banned from the UK too.

All the excuses of cultural diversity won't wash. (And BTW, should we accept "cultural diversity" as an excuse for female genital mutilation, 'honour killings' or any other 'quaint traditional customs' from mediaeval times?).


Absolutely agree, lets get rid of the royal family, the guards divisions of the british army and I think uniform at eton should be binned too while we're at it.

I know my posts on this subject have been sarcastic, but that's the point. the moment you start banning things because you don't like them, then all bets are off. just hope something you like to do or wear isn't next on the list. I'm trying to avoid falling into to the Godwin's Law trap, but you can see where we're going.
Fans' Club Morecambe

join the facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/home.php?sk=group_183535545003563&id=193325224024595&notif_t=like
Updated, interactive, snazzy website coming soon...
User avatar
bigreddog
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: all around Lancashire

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby EDD » Sat Jul 17, 2010 8:25 pm

scar wrote:
DawZi wrote:just on that note alone them do-gooders who stick up for them trying to be self-righteous they can always go and live in a Muslim country if they think our women are slags and go back to the stone age.


The above statement could be right out of the handbook for your average Taliban member. It shows no understanding of their religion, beliefs or ways.

We live in a tollerent moderate country and I'd like to think we've evolved to be understanding and welcoming to all, after all it was us years ago who went around the globe impressing our ways on them and thus the Empire was born.

It should be up to an individual as to how they dress, it's not a religious requirement and as such just like Motorcycle helmets, in certain areas for identification they should be removed. Other than that, if they want to look like a walking black letter box, let them!

Andf i'm no dogooder by a long stretch of the imagination


Live in Bradford as I do, and I can guarantee your opinon will change within a week...
MFC's Only

Morecambe FC / Bradford Park Avenue FC

Supporter
User avatar
EDD
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:37 am

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby mrpotatohead » Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:33 pm

why :?:
Surprise sex is the best thing to wake up to, unless you're in prison.
User avatar
mrpotatohead
 
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: circus

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby EDD » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:19 pm

you may not be so liberal minded....
MFC's Only

Morecambe FC / Bradford Park Avenue FC

Supporter
User avatar
EDD
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:37 am

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby durianmuncher » Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:49 pm

Have to agree with banning of the Burka. It is a symbol of repression and harmful to a healthy society. I am sure that many women are forced to wear this clobber against their will.

However there should also be stringent rules on husbands not letting their wives out of the house etc and jail for causing oppression and lack of equality to wives.
User avatar
durianmuncher
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Mark S » Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:55 pm

I would like to ban tattoos. They are a symbol of ultimate daftness.

No such thing as a classy or tasteful tattoo IMO.

While we are at it, there should be fines for swearing in public. In your own home is fine but please dont pollute my ear space.
Mark S
 
Posts: 3094
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:47 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby durianmuncher » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:05 am

Mark S wrote:I would like to ban tattoos. They are a symbol of ultimate daftness.

No such thing as a classy or tasteful tattoo IMO.

While we are at it, there should be fines for swearing in public. In your own home is fine but please dont pollute my ear space.



Difference is, tattoos and swearing are personal choice, the burka, in many cases. most definitely is not.
User avatar
durianmuncher
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby USA Shrimp » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:51 am

I have quite a few muslim students in the school where I teach and they have a variety of dress styles - from full burqa to just plain old regular clothes. There seems to be a lot of folk on this board commenting on muslim culture without really having any experience of it. How many people who have expressed a strong opinion on this issue have actually spoken to a muslim about this?

Maybe Peter? Maybe?
User avatar
USA Shrimp
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:16 am
Location: The City of Brotherly Love. Philadelphia, PA

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Curly » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:10 am

Mark S wrote:I would like to ban tattoos. They are a symbol of ultimate daftness.

No such thing as a classy or tasteful tattoo IMO.

While we are at it, there should be fines for swearing in public. In your own home is fine but please dont pollute my ear space.


Would I still be allowed to leave the house if I wear my Burqa?
YOU ALWAYS WAS AND YOU ALWAYS WAS BE!!!

Image
User avatar
Curly
 
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:00 pm
Location: Out, wit' dog

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Mark S » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:07 am

Curly wrote:
Mark S wrote:I would like to ban tattoos. They are a symbol of ultimate daftness.

No such thing as a classy or tasteful tattoo IMO.

While we are at it, there should be fines for swearing in public. In your own home is fine but please dont pollute my ear space.


Would I still be allowed to leave the house if I wear my Burqa?


Nope.

I also used to support a ban on bald heads but lately I have changed my mind.
Mark S
 
Posts: 3094
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:47 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby scar » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:14 am

Mark S wrote:
Curly wrote:
Mark S wrote:I would like to ban tattoos. They are a symbol of ultimate daftness.

No such thing as a classy or tasteful tattoo IMO.

While we are at it, there should be fines for swearing in public. In your own home is fine but please dont pollute my ear space.


Would I still be allowed to leave the house if I wear my Burqa?


Nope.

I also used to support a ban on bald heads but lately I have changed my mind.


I think a bad on bald heads is going a bit far... however I would support a ban on toupee's!
User avatar
scar
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:47 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Mark S » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:16 am

Now you are talking!

Ban the Toupe!
Mark S
 
Posts: 3094
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:47 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Plain Peter » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:25 am

Mark S wrote:Now you are talking!

Ban the Toupe!


:idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:
darrenlock wears a toupe :lol: :lol:
Plain Peter
 

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Keith » Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:22 am

Peter wrote:
Mark S wrote:Now you are talking!

Ban the Toupe!


:idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:
darrenlock wears a toupe :lol: :lol:


yes but he was talking about his "two piece running kit". :roll:

Ban the toupe and ban Curly from going out of his house unless wearing a burqa? We could be on to something here! First part of the manifesto comes together for the Baz's Numpty Party at the next election!
“Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice - stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Ed Miliband: ".

David Cameron. May 4th 2015.
So how did that work out then?
User avatar
Keith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22102
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby durianmuncher » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:37 pm

USA Shrimp wrote:I have quite a few muslim students in the school where I teach and they have a variety of dress styles - from full burqa to just plain old regular clothes. There seems to be a lot of folk on this board commenting on muslim culture without really having any experience of it. How many people who have expressed a strong opinion on this issue have actually spoken to a muslim about this?

Maybe Peter? Maybe?



I have had lots of conversations with Muslims about it and have heard viewpoints across the spectrum, not least my wife (who abhors them).

On the one hand some women have stated that they find the burqa liberating, spiritual, an item of clothing which brings them closer to God and their families (submission). One stated that she wore it because she was appalled at the liberalism across the world and in particular the garbage that she believed is produced in Bollywood and Collywood.

On the other hand, I had a late teen come into the room in tears because she was seen in the shopping mall without a scarf and was severely berated. This was in her own free time.

Other people have stated how they hate wearing them in terribly hot weather, but that they have no choice of their own if they are to remain a part of their family.

I have spoken to many Iranians who, while not in burqas but just headscarves, are furious and disgusted by President Ahmadinejad''s government making all Iranian women wear them in the street.

On two separate occasions, females have come into their class in a burqa, and seeing that there were no other male Arabs, have taken the head part off and been delighted they could do so safely in public, stating their absolute hate for them, and talking about the pressure they are under to submit to the burqa. 10 minutes before the end they would cover up again, much to everyone's amusement and amazement.

Thus, if it were truly an individual choice, I would have no hesitation to denounce those calling for it to be banned. However, I have seen and heard many that hate them but are forced to wear them, so I veer towards banning them because anything in between would be rather complex to successfully police.
User avatar
durianmuncher
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Plain Peter » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:29 pm

Some excellent reading here:

http://www.jeansasson.com/books/princess-trilogy.html

Not surprising, the books are banned in certain countries.
Plain Peter
 

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Keith » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:34 pm

durianmuncher wrote:On two separate occasions, females have come into their class in a burqa, and seeing that there were no other male Arabs, have taken the head part off and been delighted they could do so safely in public, stating their absolute hate for them, and talking about the pressure they are under to submit to the burqa. 10 minutes before the end they would cover up again, much to everyone's amusement and amazement.

Thus, if it were truly an individual choice, I would have no hesitation to denounce those calling for it to be banned. However, I have seen and heard many that hate them but are forced to wear them, so I veer towards banning them because anything in between would be rather complex to successfully police.


But if banned, would those females have simply been stopped by their families from attending your classes altogether?

Don't get me wrong, I don't like them and I am totally against the subjugation of women but I believe that for many women the banning of the burqa would simply imprison them further whilst removing the freedom of choice from those who want to wear the outfit.
“Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice - stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Ed Miliband: ".

David Cameron. May 4th 2015.
So how did that work out then?
User avatar
Keith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22102
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby durianmuncher » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:45 pm

[/quote]

But if banned, would those females have simply been stopped by their families from attending your classes altogether?

Don't get me wrong, I don't like them and I am totally against the subjugation of women but I believe that for many women the banning of the burqa would simply imprison them further whilst removing the freedom of choice from those who want to wear the outfit.
[b][/b][/quote]


Unfortunately, I am sure you are right. Many females would be kept indoors and their lives would be even more isolated. Basically, the situation is between the proverbial rock and a hard place as while what you state is undeniably true, the fact remains that there are many women who would love to dress like everyone else and their basic right to do this is being infringed.

The difficult question remains. How can such an impasse be resolved? Certainly not for a significant time period and a continued degree of suffering on one side or the other, whichever route our illustrious leaders deign to travel.
User avatar
durianmuncher
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby durianmuncher » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:59 pm

Apologies for the double post, but to highlight Keith's valid point:

http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/may/05 ... t-laws.htm
User avatar
durianmuncher
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Stanley Bowles » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:12 pm

Ban it ,as a ex service man who served in the Gulf, we respected their laws in their country covering our arms flesh up in ramadam. We are not aloud to wear and show a cross round our kneck in irab countries and to me the wearing of a cross is not a security threat walking into a shopping centre.They spit at our feet if we do not agree to our ways which we do adear to when we are over there. If we where to walk down Dahran high street wearing our traditional dress the speedo trunks :lol:im sure we would be delt with in the form of 100 lashes,whos still living in the 3rd world now and there trying to convert us back to the dark ages p.s The Burka isnt about relgion ,its to worn in sandstorms and there isnt many of them here in our green and pleasant land .Plesae respect our country before its to late :shock:
The dead don't have a choice - we do!
User avatar
Stanley Bowles
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:24 am

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Plain Peter » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:26 pm

durianmuncher wrote:Apologies for the double post, but to highlight Keith's valid point:

http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/may/05 ... t-laws.htm


But there is a 'health warning' at the bottom of that article.
I wouldn't surprise me if the husband was told to 'wind his neck in' by the Muslim Council.
Last edited by Plain Peter on Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Plain Peter
 

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby Keith » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:35 pm

Stanley Bowles wrote:If we where to walk down Dahran high street wearing our traditional dress the speedo trunks :lol:im sure we would be delt with in the form of 100 lashes,


If you waked down Lancaster Road wearing a pair of speedos, you'd deserve 100 lashes! After the mental image of Aspers in a bikini, I really will need therapy to get me through today!

So to sum your argument up, the middle east has some oppressive, backward regimes that forces people dress in a certain way and the best way for our enlightened, forward looking regime to counter that is by forcing people to dress in a certain way?

The burqa isn't about religion. It is mainly about male oppression of women and sometimes about women's choice to dress in an ultra-conservative manner. Those women who choose to wear it should be allowed to continue, with certain restrictions where clear identification is required. But those women who are oppressed would become more so by changing the law in this manner. Changing the law so that oppressing wives & sisters in the first place would be a better start... but then, it's only recently that 'wife beating' started to be taken seriously so we've yet to get our own house in order in that respect.
“Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice - stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Ed Miliband: ".

David Cameron. May 4th 2015.
So how did that work out then?
User avatar
Keith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22102
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: O/T BURKA

Postby marky No.1 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:01 pm

Keith wrote:'wife beating' started to be taken seriously


It's not just wives tho is it? Spare a thought for battered husbands as well :o

figures show 2,336 women faced court on charges of domestic violence in 2007, mainly for bashing their husbands, compared with just 818 in 1999.

News Ltd says men's groups say they're happy that police are finally taking men seriously, but it's still hard for husbands to admit they've been attacked by their wives.

Research shows women tend to use guns, knives, boiling liquids and irons to attack their partners.

The increase in violence, which is often fuelled by alcohol, has sparked calls for refuges for men.

Assistant Commissioner Mark Murdoch says there's no definitive explanation for the increasing number of women being prosecuted for domestic violence offences.


http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/828 ... n-the-rise

Imagine having to face this after a hard day at the office :lol:
Unidentified-Human.jpg
Last edited by marky No.1 on Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Enjoy yourself.... It is later than you think
User avatar
marky No.1
 
Posts: 22126
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Carnforth

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 129 guests

cron