the difference between the two

the difference between the two

Postby cragbankshrimp » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:04 pm

Daggers weren't any better than us today and barring two soft goals we should have come away with all thre points. The way i see it is when the ball goes forward to Rene or Blinks its usually to their heads, shoulders or chests and by the time theyve brought the ball under control they are surrounded by opposition shirts and little options because the midfielders don't get forward quick enough. Today Daggers got the ball to feet and drove forward in numbers.
Because we are struggling to score and continue to concede soft goals i'd like to see the following team against Shrewsbury.
Roche
McStay Jimbo Artell Festa
Drummy Stanners Wainwright
Wayun Dermuid Rene

At least if we concede two there's a chance we might have scored three. Heres hoping
Last edited by cragbankshrimp on Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Accrington Stanley" Who are they??????????????
cragbankshrimp
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: Rural Carnforth

Re: the difference between the two

Postby Vinny » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:08 pm

cragbankshrimp wrote:Daggers weren't any better than us today and barring two soft goals we should have come away with all thre points. The way i see it is when the ball goes forward to Rene or Blinks its usually to their heads, shoulders or chests and by the time theyve brought the ball under control they are surrounded by opposition shirts and little options because the midfielders don't get forward quick enough. Today Daggers got the ball to feet and drove forward in numbers.
Because we are struggling to score and continue to concede soft goals i'd like to see the following team against Shrewsbury.
Roche
McStay Jimbo Artell Festa
Wayun Drummy Stanners Wainwright
Blinky Dermuid Rene

At least if we concede two there's a chance we might have scored three. Heres hoping


Absolutely spot on.
Bring me sunshine, in your smile.
A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.
User avatar
Vinny
 
Posts: 1293
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:19 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby Shrimpsscene » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:09 pm

you have a 4 4 3 formation there
we would have a better chance i suppose
;)
Shrimpsscene
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:07 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby campdave » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:09 pm

The difference when Hunter and Drummond came on and stuff actually went through the midfield was amazing
campdave
 

Re: the difference between the two

Postby cragbankshrimp » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:12 pm

Well spotted Shrimpscene. Do you think we'd get away with it
"Accrington Stanley" Who are they??????????????
cragbankshrimp
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: Rural Carnforth

Re: the difference between the two

Postby John L » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:14 pm

I think we'd all like to see 12 on the pitch, but it ain't gonna happen! ;)

Not usually one for these predict-a-team threads, but seeing as how I'm contributing anyway....

Roche,
Parrish-Bentley-McStay-Howard,
Wainwright-Drummond-Hunter-Curtis,
Howe-Blinkhorn.
Subs: Davies, Artell, McCann, Carr, O'Carroll.

....or something like that!
John L
 
Posts: 5039
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:41 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby BHmfc » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:17 pm

Nothing between the two sides in the 1st half, but after Roche gifted them the first goal our midfield went AWOL, meaning the team lost all shape. There was a big improvement after the subs came on, just a shame we could not nick a second goal.
BHmfc
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:58 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby admiral47 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:25 pm

I think the reason why Blinkhorn is in the team is because we are always looking at the long high ball from defence, also when we get in a good position on the wing we lack so much pace that the other teams fill the area. I would like to see up experiment and play the ball to feet and give O’Carroll a start with Howe, also I would like to see Drummond and Stanners/Hunter as our regular midfield, lets face it the two who started today should be squad players- they are not good enough. I thought Curtis would be more of a squad player this year as the squad was supposed to be strengthened but he is looking one of the better players. I have to say other than a couple of players we look like at best like an average conference team. When you think about the team who got us promoted we are significantly weaker.
admiral47
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:48 am

Re: the difference between the two

Postby BHmfc » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:28 pm

If we are picking teams again, here goes.........

DAVIES
MCSTAY ARTELL BENTLEY HOWARD
HUNTER DRUMMOND WAINRIGHT
OCARROLL
BLINKHORN HOWE
BHmfc
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:58 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby admiral47 » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:30 pm

I like the look of that team why don't you email Sammy.

Colin
admiral47
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:48 am

Re: the difference between the two

Postby outsider » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:50 pm

Davis
Parrish Mcstay Bentley Adams
Curtis Drummy Hunter Wainwright
O'Carroll Howe

would do for me
All posts posted under "Outsider" are my own personal views.

DILLIGAF


Viva la Revolution


The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!
User avatar
outsider
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:23 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby Shrimpsscene » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:58 pm

cragbankshrimp wrote:Well spotted Shrimpscene. Do you think we'd get away with it

we could always try it...... 8-)
lets see what sammy does Tuesday and not forgetting there is a ressies game wednesday too
4 4 3 its the future.........
Shrimpsscene
 
Posts: 914
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:07 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby Crooky MFC » Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:43 pm

I know it's probably not going to happen, but let's get Twiss back into the side. We need some of his magic :cry:
Crooky MFC
 
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:25 pm
Location: Torrisholme

Re: the difference between the two

Postby heysham_mfc » Sat Aug 30, 2008 8:07 pm

Crooky MFC wrote:I know it's probably not going to happen, but let's get Twiss back into the side. We need some of his magic :cry:

all his magic seems to have run out :cry:
heysham_mfc
 
Posts: 5320
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:22 pm
Location: Heysham

Re: the difference between the two

Postby sandgrown » Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:35 pm

campdave wrote:The difference when Hunter and Drummond came on and stuff actually went through the midfield was amazing


absolutely, Drummond, Hunter/Stanley, O'Carrol, must be given a start next week.

sadly. Carr looks completely out of his depth.
User avatar
sandgrown
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:13 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby Sammy h » Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:43 pm

heysham_mfc wrote:
Crooky MFC wrote:I know it's probably not going to happen, but let's get Twiss back into the side. We need some of his magic :cry:

all his magic seems to have run out :cry:



How do we know that when we haven't seen him play in donkeys? We need him back.
User avatar
Sammy h
 
Posts: 2736
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:25 pm
Location: Lancaster

Re: the difference between the two

Postby parkyboy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:09 pm

Definitely need changes for the Shrews match ,midfield and back four. The team i would like to see is .
Davies
Parrish, Bentley,Mcstay,Howard
Wainwright, Stanleyor Hunter,Drummond
Twissor Curtis
Howe and Ocarroll
parkyboy
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:14 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby Christies Child » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:34 pm

..hows about an 'out and out' left winger in that lot?

The next 24 hours plus could be interesting!

;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: the difference between the two

Postby marky » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:37 pm

It's just a thought, but given Adams looks like a player that will never be dropped, couldn't Howard play on the left-wing in the interim? He's got a left foot, for a start...
Some are dead and some are living. In my life, I've loved them all.
marky
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: the difference between the two

Postby parkyboy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:46 pm

Good point Marky , but would you leave Adams at left back on present form or try someone else there. Another point to perhaps consider with our defensive problems , have they got the confidence in Roches ability or would they have more confidence in Davies
parkyboy
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:14 pm

Re: the difference between the two

Postby marky » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:56 pm

I wouldn't have Adams anywhere near the team, but Sammy obviously is of a differing opinion. Therefore, to make the best of it, I would suggest having Howard on the left-wing (though I would prefer him a left-back with a true left-winger brought into the side).
Some are dead and some are living. In my life, I've loved them all.
marky
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: the difference between the two

Postby Christies Child » Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:44 pm

parkyboy wrote:Good point Marky , but would you leave Adams at left back on present form or try someone else there. Another point to perhaps consider with our defensive problems , have they got the confidence in Roches ability or would they have more confidence in Davies


In pre-season games you could hear Roach giving orders to Jimbo and Co.

As a centre stander where you can't here much above the noise inferno from the North Stand (sometimes :lol: ), has he lost his voice recently because communication seems to have become a problem?
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests