Fallowfield Shrimp wrote:I know. He had a great game too. Just shows what pressure does to you. He knew that they were going through to the semis uf he put it in. But as you say to step up 1st in the shoot out showed immense bottle. Great pen too. Why didn't he do that the 1st time.
I'd quite like to see that Uruguayan banned for another match. His actions have kept his side in the tournament when they should really be out. Oh well!
scar wrote:Shock Horror, a South American uses his hand to change the course of a game!
Felt for the Ghanans, the deserved the win without a doubt.
james456 wrote:By cheating - and actually suffering the full consequences of his actions as per the rules of the game - his team has still benefitted which is completely unjust.
Ghana were denied a definite goal because of the opposition cheating and the repercussions were that they had a chance to get the goal that was taken from them and suarez was suspended from a game he was never going to play in had he not cheated...
durhamshrimp wrote:He might not have been a cheat but they were cheated.
shrimper wrote:Just unfortunate that this happened right at the end so the sending off was of little benefit to Ghana, but I don't know how you can sensibly legislate for that.
Peter wrote:The rules need looking at so that a team is never denied an absolutely certain goal again by a bog standard hand-ball.
Peter wrote:But it's another law that needs looking at. Referees, in very important matches, should have the discretion to award penalty goals.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 105 guests