SQUAD SIZE

SQUAD SIZE

Postby mrpotatohead » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:23 pm

At present on wickipedia we are showing a squad of fifteen players, obviously too few, if this is the case, how many more players do we need to be effective this season, i would say at least 5 more :?:
Surprise sex is the best thing to wake up to, unless you're in prison.
User avatar
mrpotatohead
 
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: circus

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby marky » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:25 pm

3 outfield players plus a reserve goalkeeper I'd say. Don't forget there are 3 youth players to be added to that list (which I would have put on when I re-added Jevons last night but I don't know their names).
Some are dead and some are living. In my life, I've loved them all.
marky
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby mrpotatohead » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:29 pm

I would say a reserve keeper, centre half and striker or two as back up :?:
Surprise sex is the best thing to wake up to, unless you're in prison.
User avatar
mrpotatohead
 
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: circus

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby ockers » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:35 pm

id have said 22 was more than enough
ockers
 
Posts: 2981
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:08 pm

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby George Dawes » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:37 pm

we only have two strikers on the books so id say at least one more so say two

then we've lost Artell & McStay and Bentley will be slowly taking a back seat as first team action goes, id say two central defenders

id say in the midfield department, we could do with one play-maker

and one back up keeper

15 + 6 = 21 players in the squad thats two players just about fighting for every position, now thats a good healthy size for a club the size of ours.
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby shrimpnsave » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:33 pm

we need 7 more.......... ;)
football is a funny old game
User avatar
shrimpnsave
 
Posts: 6311
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:21 pm

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby Squaddie_Shrimp » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:37 pm

how many players we bring in depends on what kind of quality were looking at, if sammys happy with the first team then he'll be looking to sign around 4 or 5 players to bulk out the squad but if he's wanting to reinforce the starting XI then itll be more like 2 or 3 players to keep the wage budget down.
Results are temporary... Shrimps Pride is Forever
Squaddie_Shrimp
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:40 pm
Location: Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby heysham_mfc » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:44 pm

mrpotatohead wrote:I would say a reserve keeper, centre half and striker or two as back up :?:

yes hopefully get another good striker and a younger one as back up.
heysham_mfc
 
Posts: 5320
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:22 pm
Location: Heysham

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby George Dawes » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:47 pm

i think it's first team players SM needs to sign and will do

id like a experienced bench of players who can come on and..

Bentley(to steady the ship)
Mullin(great impact sub)
Drummond(knows what to do)
Hunter(to break up play)
Wainwright(good cover for Duffy&Rundle)
another keeper?
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby Christies Child » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:59 pm

More quality even if it's less bodies for me.

Could have sworn somewhere that I'd read about a certain striker signing very soon for us. :? :? :?

Memory must be playing tricks with me. :oops:
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby mrpotatohead » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:05 pm

With respect dawsy, the players mentioned on your list are better than bench warmers and particularly in drummers and jimbos cases, will want as much matchtime as possible, which they fully deserve.
Surprise sex is the best thing to wake up to, unless you're in prison.
User avatar
mrpotatohead
 
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: circus

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby bigreddog » Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:34 pm

we've let go Adams, Twiss, Curtis, McLachlan, Artell, Davies, Taylor, Poole, Jackson and Winters in the last few months and obviously brought in Jevons (sort of) and Rundle. But a lot of the players who we may be after probably only ended their contracts last week so I'm sure there'll be a lot more activity in the next few days. as long as they are the right people, not just to get numbers in.
Fans' Club Morecambe

join the facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/home.php?sk=group_183535545003563&id=193325224024595&notif_t=like
Updated, interactive, snazzy website coming soon...
User avatar
bigreddog
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: all around Lancashire

Re: SQUAD SIZE

Postby shrimper » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:36 am

mrpotatohead wrote:With respect dawsy, the players mentioned on your list are better than bench warmers and particularly in drummers and jimbos cases, will want as much matchtime as possible, which they fully deserve.



But none of them, except Gary, are young players who are likely to improve next season. If we want to improve as a team (and we need to if we're to even get anywhere near what we achieved last season) then some of last season's regular first-teamers need to be pushed out by better incoming players.

That's progress - and it's why we let some of last season's bench-warmers go. No point just bringing in players to replace those on the bench.
Is the glass half full or half empty? Mmmm? hard to say - but it does look like there's room for more beer!
User avatar
shrimper
 
Posts: 4870
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:36 pm
Location: Morecambe


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 94 guests

cron