shrimpnsave wrote:IS WRONG WITH OUR AWAY PERFOMANCES
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
beggars belief...
Jekyll and Mr Hyde
P/T Indie wrote:Mark Duffy is the answer he is just not an away player.
Sounds like he had a shocker lost the ball everytime and then their 2nd sounded like a repeat of the goal against Crewe where he lost the ball in our area and they ran up the pitch and scored.
Fair enough Curtis was injured tonight who might have started instead but then why not play Hunter and as the 2nd half went on Hunter should have come on.
We just seem to be really scrappy away and look a shadow of the team that plays at home no confidence, lack of ideas etc
Sammy h wrote:One point off the play-offs. 4 games to go. It is still in our hands as teams still need to play eachother.
We don't need this negative crap, bring on Saturday!
Posh wrote:To be fair to Duffy he at least got in the right position, took on players and posed a threat. Final ball was poor and the poor pitch didn't help. He tried hard. Compare this to Hackney who was far far worse but seemingly gets less stick because he didn't try and thus couldn't fail but when he did He posed far less of a threat than Duffs.
outsider wrote:With a bit of luck there will be one good thing to come out of last night.
We were again over run in midfield and the game was crying out for HUNTER.
Please sammy and Garry sort it out for the sake of our season.
Harry wrote:In the last 5 or so minutes when we went 3-5-2 I think we were the most threatening we'd been all night and that may be a good option for playing away from home, with the same personnel who ended the game last night. Stanley and Drummond sat well without going forward too much and with Duffy in front of them (maybe replaced by Hunter after 70 mins) could provide decent service to a player who can do something in that position.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 17 guests