paulshrimp wrote:Great new crest. Would Globe Stadium have sounded better?
fletch_al wrote:paulshrimp wrote:Great new crest. Would Globe Stadium have sounded better?
yeah i would have preferred globe stadium. but i suppose that would refer only to the ground itself not all the facilities that we have with it
John L wrote:Yeah, the potential chaos caused by a beer delivery going to our Globe won't be as bad as if we were sponsored by Sainsburys and got one of their deliveries by mistake!
Wednesdayite wrote:could have been worse...thank god the sponsorship deal wasnt immodium![]()
Sammy h wrote:It was inevitable that this would happen. The construction firm that are building the stadium sponsor it. So in other words, the club get 250k knocked off the bill. Which means globe construction add it on in hidden costs as we all know these firms do. Which means all the club get out of it is a terrible stadium name.
wijit wrote:Short of being the Ann Summers Arena, I can't see how much worse it could be!
We have a name which would be more suited to a ground6 or 7 times the capacity we will have and a badge which looks like it belongs on an under 12's team shirt.
One reason for the badge design change was that it is easier to control it for copyright purposes. Well, I never saw Lancaster Road flooded with people selling fake club stuff.
I know some of you will try to give me hell for this, but frankly, this has cheapened the club in my opinion. The badge is just a copy of the Arsenal badge, and not a good one at that.
Did we actually get any money for the ground name? I doubt that, most clubs are pleased to say they got X amount for selling their soul, I mean ground name. No, we will have got a discount. Who benefits from this discount, us or sainsbury's, as they paid for the build didn't they?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 43 guests