alwaysright wrote:saesonsinthesun, no disrespect to you but it amazes me, but when someone does go against the norm on here certain people just dont like it so thats why as you put it i do get a bit rebelious, i think its quite funny how much some people get het up about it .
Christies Child wrote:Bloody hell......all this personal abuse...AND WE F***ING WON!
What would you all be like had we LOST.....
Grow up and be thankful that we got a positive result.
I'm not Sammy's biggest fan, but tonight he and the team deserve some slack.
OLDHAMADE wrote:What really beggars belief is Sammy had the very same players at his disposal for other games and didn't use em, had he done would we have won other games???? just a thought
Christies Child wrote:Bloody hell......all this personal abuse...AND WE F***ING WON!
What would you all be like had we LOST.....
Grow up and be thankful that we got a positive result.
I'm not Sammy's biggest fan, but tonight he and the team deserve some slack.
Curly wrote:Christies Child wrote:Bloody hell......all this personal abuse...AND WE F***ING WON!
What would you all be like had we LOST.....
Grow up and be thankful that we got a positive result.
I'm not Sammy's biggest fan, but tonight he and the team deserve some slack.
You're definately someones biggest fan :lol:
OLDHAMADE wrote:I personally think that ockers is way OTT with his 'ONE SIDED' mini rant over other peoples opinions on here, YES we all know that you work in close tandum with the club but that doesn't give you or anyone else the right to ride roughshod over a paying customers opinion.
Here's mine! Lincoln were CRAP!!!! the WORST SIDE i've seen for years and actually made us look like Brazil, poor old Chris Sutton will be out before he's started with that shower.
Now for the POSITIVES, we ACTUALLY WON for once YIPPPPPPPPPPPPPEEE DO!!! It wasn't pretty but it didn't matter, up against a better side we might have got another draw, How did I feel during the game????
Nervous as hell and even at 2-0 up I really didn't feel comfortable such is our inability to hold a lead but credit where it's due we held out,
What really beggars belief is Sammy had the very same players at his disposal for other games and didn't use em, had he done would we have won other games???? just a thought
Crooky MFC wrote:To be fair Neil Wainwright needed to go out on loan to gain some much needed match experience
Posh wrote:Crooky MFC wrote:To be fair Neil Wainwright needed to go out on loan to gain some much needed match experience
I'm confused. Neil Wainwright's been fit since the start of the season and was one of our best players in last season's run in. I can't see why he needed to go out on loan to prove himself or get fit.
Without going into the reasons, Adam Yates left the club and we needed a replacement as a right wing-back. We started with Darren Moss (no because orthodox right back), since then we've played Garry Hunter, Mark Duffy and even Wayne Curtis in that role. Finally we've fallen back, for me, on the best candidate - a naturally right-sided player with the stamina to get up and down the wing (and proven) who delivers a decent ball and can beat his man plus put in a decent tackle when needed.
As for the central midfield, was Ian Craney injured or dropped? As he wasn't on the bench I can only assume injured. As a result we put in Stanners and Garry Hunter to do the hard work, bags of energy, pace and physical commitment, whereas Drummy had a more free role where he got up an down the park using his experience and it worked.
Like this time last season certain players seem to have been foresaken after a lengthy spell to prove themselves, by luck of judgement, for those who may not necessarily be as skilful as others but have the other characteristics - passion, determination, energy and stamina - to get us results.
As many have said, we knew we'd get there in the end and long may it continue.
Im confused too, because i thought Yatesy played at right back and Thommo played at right wing . Darren Moss came highly rated from Shrewbury as a RIGHT BACK replacement for Yatesy but was played at wing back which he wasn't suited to. Play him in his proper position and im sure he will do a job for us like Wainey will as a winger. Maybe Craney was dropped because of his poor workrate over last couple of games , Stanners isn't as creative but has a lot more energy, i just hope next time he wears his Beckham boots instead of Jonny Wilkinsons. . Only my opinion but i would rather have 4-4-2 . Moss,Parrish, Bentley and Wilson
parceldave wrote:Posh wrote:Crooky MFC wrote:To be fair Neil Wainwright needed to go out on loan to gain some much needed match experience
I'm confused. Neil Wainwright's been fit since the start of the season and was one of our best players in last season's run in. I can't see why he needed to go out on loan to prove himself or get fit.
Without going into the reasons, Adam Yates left the club and we needed a replacement as a right wing-back. We started with Darren Moss (no because orthodox right back), since then we've played Garry Hunter, Mark Duffy and even Wayne Curtis in that role. Finally we've fallen back, for me, on the best candidate - a naturally right-sided player with the stamina to get up and down the wing (and proven) who delivers a decent ball and can beat his man plus put in a decent tackle when needed.
As for the central midfield, was Ian Craney injured or dropped? As he wasn't on the bench I can only assume injured. As a result we put in Stanners and Garry Hunter to do the hard work, bags of energy, pace and physical commitment, whereas Drummy had a more free role where he got up an down the park using his experience and it worked.
Like this time last season certain players seem to have been foresaken after a lengthy spell to prove themselves, by luck of judgement, for those who may not necessarily be as skilful as others but have the other characteristics - passion, determination, energy and stamina - to get us results.
As many have said, we knew we'd get there in the end and long may it continue.
Im confused too, because i thought Yatesy played at right back and Thommo played at right wing . Darren Moss came highly rated from Shrewbury as a RIGHT BACK replacement for Yatesy but was played at wing back which he wasn't suited to. Play him in his proper position and im sure he will do a job for us like Wainey will as a winger. Maybe Craney was dropped because of his poor workrate over last couple of games , Stanners isn't as creative but has a lot more energy, i just hope next time he wears his Beckham boots instead of Jonny Wilkinsons. . Only my opinion but i would rather have 4-4-2 . Moss,Parrish, Bentley and Wilson
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 54 guests