parceldave wrote:shrimper wrote:So........ do you think we shouldn't have got him? Or should he now be dropped to make way for.... who? Twissy?
Not arguing, just wondering what you think. You're criticising Mullin - what's your alternative within the squad? Or do you think we should have got someone else?
Its easy to say we should have got someone else Glen but we probably had no one else at the time to go for. I was just making the point that from the games i have seen and i think you were there too ,that he has missed some really good chances . Dont know about dropping him but i would like to see Twissy given a bit more time on the pitch and maybe Wayno. I just wish all the forwards in genral would have a shot from outside the box with some venom behind it . Did you read the Aldershot reporters comments when he descibed our shots on goal as Powderpuff

I wasn't arguing, as I said, I was interested to hear what your general views were on the whole Mullin thing.
I've seen the games you have and can't disagree with what you say about his misses.
All I'd say in response is that Twissy has missed as many, as has Jevons.
But I think Mullin offers a lot more in his game than just scoring (and he has contributed goals).
He doesn't lose many in the air, he's strong, works hard, keeps possession well and brings others into the game.
I think signing him was a very good move.
I also think Twissy could be brought on a bit sooner in some games but I wouldn't bring him on for Mullin.
I think he's more a replacement for Jevons, or if the need arises, bring him on for Danny Adams and slip Wilson to orthodox left back with Twissy attacking from that flank.
Is the glass half full or half empty? Mmmm? hard to say - but it does look like there's room for more beer!