loose change
DawZi wrote:totally agree it still gets me watching it
i dont know if you've seen it but there's a DVD they tried banning you can still DL or buy off Ebay calledloose change
its a conspiracy theory version with some dodgy stuff on like how impossible it was for a plane to hit bullseye at the pentagon, and why when helicopter pilots said it wasn't a problem landing on the roofs, a drill they use to practise often was told to stay away, and that the smoke wasn't really a problem![]()
raises a good few eyebrows
DawZi wrote:i remember one witness saying the first plane was a "british airways"
durhamshrimp wrote:People only crow on about this because it was an act of terrorism and because it's America. Sad as it was, it's dwelled upon much more than the bravery and tragedy that occured 4 years later in the asian tsunami where nearly 100 times as many people died.
Keith wrote:Exactly as Posh said, the fact that this atrocity was filmed so much has made it so widely witnessed. Some of the images are iconic. You could even argue that had it been a grim, grey day, those images would not have attained such iconic status. There is almost a 'beauty' in the way the buildings collapsed, the colour of the explosion etc, set against that glorious blue sky. Additionally, we all witness it and try to imagine what would we be doing if we were trapped in there? The fear, the panic, probably long enough for the adrenaline to subside and some degree of acceptance? On Sunday there was a documentary featuring the phone calls made by the people who were trapped.
I'm not particularly a fan of the USA, but I don't think that the attack on the World Trade Centre is remembered 'because' it was in America.
I'm not particularly a fan of the USA, but I don't think that the attack on the World Trade Centre is remembered 'because' it was in America.
Posh wrote:One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter and all that.
What's changed in my view, firstly, is the move from political terrorism to belief-based terrorism; secondly the funding of terrorist movements, particularly the state-funding of organisations like Hezbollah, Hamas and, probably, Al Qaeda; and finally the broader-range of targets and equipment they can use to engage in acts of terror.
What hasn't changed is the Middle East and that will continue to stoke terrorism for a long time to come. Actions such as the obscene invasion of Gaza by Israel and the horrific acts it undertook, and the fundamentalism of the holocaust-deniers of Iran will mean that we'll have another generation of people alienated, pained, aggrieved and downright angry at the actions of others who are the next fodder for terrorist leaders.
DawZi wrote:i must admit israel does seriously need sorting out, ie. give the palestinians a state of there own, so then extremists cant use it as a excuse against the west. i wont say to much but the jewish people after WW2 should know how the palestinians feel to a extent although there no angels themselves
Star08 wrote:To pick up Posh's point I do wonder whether politically-based terrorism forms the basis for belief-based terrorism as political attempts are perhaps seen to have failed. Generally human beings turn to religion when there is insecurity and unrest; how much more so when a country's autonomy has been interfered with by other nations? The Middle East is a case in point, as is Northern Ireland. The West has had long term involvement in the Middle East and we and our descendants are likely to pay the price for some time to come.
Posh wrote:P.S. The only possible 'Westernised' political equivalent, possibly, of what is being perpetrated by Islamic terrorists is this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_of_the_deed...
Posh wrote:Compare to that organisations as different as Al Qaeda and Aum Shinrikyo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarin_gas_ ... kyo_subway) their only terror target seems to be creating terror itself against a broad enemy without any known end game. In both cases though martyrdom and the continuation of life in another place is a positive result in itself for the perpetrator helping fuel a cycle of never-ending violence. How do you neogtiate with that?
DawZi wrote:one of the best books Ive ever read "the nemesis file" true story about a group of four SAS guys who went undercover in northern Ireland to fight a dirty war back was going through executing all IRA members, then burying them in secret locations but when they got to the top members Gerry Adams & McGuinness etc.
The SAS said say the word will go in and take em out? our government thought about it had second thoughts saying "better the devil you know" at least they give 10 minute warnings before there bombs go off, getting at the next generation coming through could be ruthless
oh and the book is nothing what so ever to do with Andy McNab and the crap he writes
shrimper wrote:I have a friend around whom I have to be very careful when he talks about books.
He still (despite my hints to look a little deeper into it - I only hint so as not to upset him, he is a very dear friend) believes that the basis of the Da Vinci Code is a factual, historical account.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], vvm and 46 guests