i-love-mfc wrote:Dazzer wrote:9th
71 points
64 goals
6th Place
73 points
58 Goals
6th
75 points
73 goals
i-love-mfc wrote:Dazzer wrote:9th
71 points
64 goals
6th Place
73 points
58 Goals
i-love-mfc wrote:
6th Place
73 points
58 Goals
eggchaser wrote:10th place
66 points
56 goals scored
marky wrote:eggchaser wrote:10th place
66 points
56 goals scored
8th
69 pts
61 gls
eggchaser wrote:10th place
66 points
56 goals scored
Martin wrote:10th Place
67 Points
59 Goals
Mark S wrote:If what you are saying is true then can everyone please predict first place as this will have the power to change the future and get us promoted.
I think 7th place with 77 points and 63 goals.
Mark S wrote:I think 7th place with 77 points and 63 goals.
While our culture generally trusts experts and distrusts the wisdom of the masses, New Yorker business columnist Surowiecki argues that "under the right circumstances, groups are remarkably intelligent, and are often smarter than the smartest people in them." To support this almost counterintuitive proposition, Surowiecki explores problems involving cognition (we're all trying to identify a ...
More correct answer), coordination (we need to synchronize our individual activities with others) and cooperation (we have to act together despite our self-interest). His rubric, then, covers a range of problems, including driving in traffic, competing on TV game shows, maximizing stock market performance, voting for political candidates, navigating busy sidewalks, tracking SARS and designing Internet search engines like Google. If four basic conditions are met, a crowd's "collective intelligence" will produce better outcomes than a small group of experts, Surowiecki says, even if members of the crowd don't know all the facts or choose, individually, to act irrationally. "Wise crowds" need (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4) a good method for aggregating opinions. The diversity brings in different information; independence keeps people from being swayed by a single opinion leader; people's errors balance each other out; and including all opinions guarantees that the results are "smarter" than if a single expert had been in charge. Surowiecki's style is pleasantly informal, a tactical disguise for what might otherwise be rather dense material. He offers a great introduction to applied behavioral economics and game theory. Agent, Chris Calhoun. (On sale May 18) Forecast: While armchair social scientists (e.g., readers of The Tipping Point) will find this book interesting, college economics, math, statistics and finance students could really profit from spending time with Surowiecki. National author promos and print ads will attract buyers.
Mark S wrote:If what you are saying is true then can everyone please predict first place as this will have the power to change the future and get us promoted.
Get your watch out Keith!
I think 7th place with 77 points and 63 goals.
Vinny wrote:Mark S wrote:If what you are saying is true then can everyone please predict first place as this will have the power to change the future and get us promoted.
I think 7th place with 77 points and 63 goals.
7th place
70 points
62 goals
11th place, 53 points, 63 goals
Mighty Red wrote:Mighty Red wrote:11th place, 53 points, 63 goals
Current positions:
1 Notts County
2 Bournemouth
3 Aldershot
4 Shrewsbury
5 Torquay
6 Cheltenham
7 Dag & Red
8 Lincoln City
9 Rotherham
10 Hereford
11 Morecambe
Have I won?
Posh wrote:7th
77 points
77 goals
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 11 guests