nobbyshrimp wrote:Not from Chadwick thats a fact!
ockers wrote:but its 1 0 southport ciaran kilheeney
mix up between roche and mcstay allowed in kilheeney
Blackburn shrimp wrote:Re pitch invader glad to see the clown got thrown out what an idiot must say that the stewards in the main stand seemed to be on the ball
Mark S wrote:nobbyshrimp wrote:Not from Chadwick thats a fact!
How can that be a fact? Scored tonight, had plaudits for his play from those that were there.
Might be your opinion (based on what you know of him), but not a fact.
Not being funny, but I prefer to leave it up to the management to decide.
If you listened to one or two well respected Southport fans, Duffy is a donkey. Not from what I have seen. I think he could become one of the most exciting players we have seen here. It is down to the coaching and the environment surely?
Going further, pre season means nothing as an indication to how we will fare come the start of the season. We have been here many times before and the more times I see pre season, the more I realise it is all about trying new guys (that we wont see again in 90% of cases) and getting match fit without getting injured. This is the time just to enjoy watching without worrying.
nobbyshrimp wrote:Mark S wrote:nobbyshrimp wrote:Not from Chadwick thats a fact!
How can that be a fact? Scored tonight, had plaudits for his play from those that were there.
Might be your opinion (based on what you know of him), but not a fact.
Not being funny, but I prefer to leave it up to the management to decide.
If you listened to one or two well respected Southport fans, Duffy is a donkey. Not from what I have seen. I think he could become one of the most exciting players we have seen here. It is down to the coaching and the environment surely?
Going further, pre season means nothing as an indication to how we will fare come the start of the season. We have been here many times before and the more times I see pre season, the more I realise it is all about trying new guys (that we wont see again in 90% of cases) and getting match fit without getting injured. This is the time just to enjoy watching without worrying.
Sorry Mark but the fact is he has scored 18 league goals in 121 games in 9 years He is a lovely guy and a talented footballer but he can't score goals which is a strikers main job. I was expecting someone to reply with the 'he scored tonight'. Quite correct and he even created the penalty I believe BUT as I have previously said he has a history of scoring in the early stages at a club and then fades out. I'm not against the guy and if we sign him then I'll support him but I've seen him play enough times to know he is not the goal scorer that Morecambe need and I really think we'll struggle for goals if we sign him. Totally agree though that pre-season means nothing and is for trying out out different players/formations but I don't think NC is any better than what we already have.
Mike Blackstone wrote:The thing that struck me about Southport's ground on my last visit was the lack of cover, apart from the main stand and a tiny shed at one end. is it still like that? It was freezing that day.
nobbyshrimp wrote:Sorry Mark but the fact is he has scored 18 league goals in 121 games in 9 years He is a lovely guy and a talented footballer but he can't score goals which is a strikers main job. I was expecting someone to reply with the 'he scored tonight'. Quite correct and he even created the penalty I believe BUT as I have previously said he has a history of scoring in the early stages at a club and then fades out. I'm not against the guy and if we sign him then I'll support him but I've seen him play enough times to know he is not the goal scorer that Morecambe need and I really think we'll struggle for goals if we sign him. Totally agree though that pre-season means nothing and is for trying out out different players/formations but I don't think NC is any better than what we already have.
shrimper wrote:Chaps - stats can mean a lot but don't tell the whole picture.
Wayne has a goals to games ratio that is significantly better than Chadwick's, even though Chadwick has pretty much played as a central striker most of this career and Wayne has been pushed about all over the place.
But Wayne's goalscoring record is also better than that of Emile Heskey and you could argue that Chadwick is a player in the Heskey mould, big target man who occupies defenders, doesn't bag many himself but opens up defences so his strike partner can.
I saw bits of a partnership working with Larkin the other night so maybe....
But as I keep saying, they'd have to be SIGNIFICANTLY and obviously better than Wayne, Aaron and Twissy or I'd rather us stick with what we've got and perhaps look for a loan or two.
Heysham_Shrimp wrote:most of Waynes goals have been accumulated in the Conference.
Do any statos out there have Waynes goals to games ratio since we joined the football league ?
marky No.1 wrote:Heysham_Shrimp wrote:most of Waynes goals have been accumulated in the Conference.
Do any statos out there have Waynes goals to games ratio since we joined the football league ?
Thing is Wayne was probably THE main striker in the Conference. In the League he has played here, there and everywhere!
07/08 16 starts + 18 as a substitute - 2 goals
08/09 19 starts + 8 as sub - 5 goals
ockers wrote:On tonights performance the chances Nick Chadwick had he could have had at least a couple of goals maybe more
id like to see him start with Aaron upfront on saturday
if i was to nominate a starting 11 for saturday id go with this one
Roche
Moss Artell McStay Adams
Duffy Stanley McLachlan Wilson
Taylor Chadwick
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], black morse and 85 guests