Money or Geography?

Money or Geography?

Postby Christies Child » Mon Jul 06, 2009 3:59 pm

With no positive news to date about the signing of a striker, but it would appear a number of set backs concerning the non appearance of verbally agreed signings, I have to ask myself ' why are we apparently unable to secure the signatures of targeted players (Moss excluded)?'

Is it because we are not prepared to meet some of the inflated wage demands asked; is it a geographical proble; or is it a combination of the two?

Nearly all clubs are cutting back on playing budgets, so we are not bucking a trend there.

Having worked in both the Manchester and Liverpool areas, there might be a feeling that the motorway journey in a morning is bumper to bumper. In reality if travelling North it's the complete opposite. Travelling South and yes it's a pain in the backside.

Whatever the reasons maybe let's hope that the present apparent stalling by potential signings will come to a speedy conclusion...sooner rather than later.
Last edited by Christies Child on Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby George Dawes » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:04 pm

is concerning when you consider all the free agents about. makes you wonder what is going on :?
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby shrimper » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:18 pm

DawZi wrote:is concerning when you consider all the free agents about. makes you wonder what is going on :?


A) We want strikers.
B) We want good strikers.
C) Good strikers who are free agents are few and far between.
D) Good strikers who are free agents will, because they are few and far between, have more than one club chasing them.
E) Some of those clubs may be nearer to the player's home base than we are.

But we ARE talking to a couple of players and, if we can strike a deal that's better than others being offered to them, they'll come.

If we can't attract those players then, I suppose, we'll try to get a couple of long loans in - but we won't look to do that until we've exhausted Sammy's hitlist.
Is the glass half full or half empty? Mmmm? hard to say - but it does look like there's room for more beer!
User avatar
shrimper
 
Posts: 4870
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:36 pm
Location: Morecambe

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Abbo » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:21 pm

According to some people that post on this site there would be a huge choice of potential players to choose from come the end of june, i wonder where they are ?????
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby steve mfc » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:30 pm

Money or geography, probably both plus its the way players perceive the capabilities of a club, we will be seen as a small club who have done well to finish mid table, it will take some time before we will be seen as a established league two side rather than a non league side who is over achieving, players will usually opt for a so called bigger club who they believe has a better chance of success.

So far this close season has gone just like i expected with Sammy not getting his first or even second choice targets, there's a lot of competition out there for the better players, its a very difficult job that Sammy has trying to persuade his targets to come here.

As supporters we just have to be patient and accept the situation, possibly when we move to the new stadium it might make a difference.
steve mfc
 
Posts: 1837
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:20 pm

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Abbo » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:41 pm

It will make a big difference, i will have to turn left at the shrimp roundabout
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby campdave » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:52 pm

Abbo wrote:According to some people that post on this site there would be a huge choice of potential players to choose from come the end of june, i wonder where they are ?????


Some people don't know their arse from their elbow though.
campdave
 

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Abbo » Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:59 pm

hahaha
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby bigreddog » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:07 pm

Somewhere in the region of about 200-300 players are free agents every summer. But it's not just a numbers game. The player (his position, wage demands, character and family circumstances inluded) need to right for the club and visa versa. Act in haste repent at leisure when it comes to signing players. If we haven't learned that one by now we ever will. If Sammy can't sign the right players, I'd rather he didn't sign anybody.Like Glen says, the loan market is always there if we cant get who we want long term.
Fans' Club Morecambe

join the facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/home.php?sk=group_183535545003563&id=193325224024595&notif_t=like
Updated, interactive, snazzy website coming soon...
User avatar
bigreddog
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: all around Lancashire

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby feelingguilty » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:34 pm

This is all about patience.

Reading this board everyone has started to panic.

Imagine being a player whos contract ended in June, not too bothered at minute as got paid a week ago so can hold out for good salary (which most are unlikely to get). July mortgage payment will focus the mind and a lot will be prepared to take a lower wage as they need the signing on fee. Best deals financially will be done last week in July.

Harsh but a reality of life. Footballers are well paid but they will have financial commitments reflecting this.
feelingguilty
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:09 pm

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Christies Child » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:42 pm

feelingguilty wrote:This is all about patience.

Reading this board everyone has started to panic.

Imagine being a player whos contract ended in June, not too bothered at minute as got paid a week ago so can hold out for good salary (which most are unlikely to get). July mortgage payment will focus the mind and a lot will be prepared to take a lower wage as they need the signing on fee. Best deals financially will be done last week in July.

Harsh but a reality of life. Footballers are well paid but they will have financial commitments reflecting this.


Burnley have just signed a striker for £3 million who has received a £250,000 signing on fee. 50% of which he has donated to his former clubs youth development policy. A magnificant gesture in my view.
Heroes get mentioned but Legends never die.
Christies Child
 
Posts: 14744
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am
Location: Storth, South Lakes

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Abbo » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:26 pm

Its not a case of panicking, its imperative that the team get a good start to to the season with a few wins and i think we need to get the new players in asap in order for them to get some hard training in, to gel with the other players, after all its only 4-5 weeks to the start of the most important season in the clubs history
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Number 1 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:52 pm

If it was about geography, then the likes of Carlisle, Hartlepool, Darlington and a few others are in the same boat as us.

Perhaps we're missing a trick and should go for players from further North, rather than the other way round. Then again, there hasn't been much luck on that front has there? When you consider the likes of Sean O'Connor and Ryan McCann, and I'm sure people can remember others.
User avatar
Number 1
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:40 pm

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby heysham_mfc » Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:38 pm

there are some good strikers out there its just a case of finding the right player for the right club I am sure Sammy will get somebody in in the end
heysham_mfc
 
Posts: 5320
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:22 pm
Location: Heysham

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Abbo » Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:51 pm

*Get somebody in in the end* now that smacks of desperation.
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Posh » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:49 pm

steve mfc wrote:Money or geography, probably both plus its the way players perceive the capabilities of a club, we will be seen as a small club who have done well to finish mid table, it will take some time before we will be seen as a established league two side rather than a non league side who is over achieving, players will usually opt for a so called bigger club who they believe has a better chance of success.


Of course it could be seen that Morecambe is an exceptional place to get good coaching, get to play regular first team football and like Baker, Perkins, Thompson, Lewis and Carlton to progress your career.
VIVE LA REVOLUTION!
User avatar
Posh
 
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Everywhere and nowhere baby

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Posh » Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:56 pm

Christies Child wrote:Is it because we are not prepared to meet some of the inflated wage demands asked; is it a geographical proble; or is it a combination of the two?


I think the facts should speak for themselves. To my knowledge we've so far missed out on three strikers.

1. Michael Gash. Offered our limit, which was turned down by their unusual setup. So money but according to their fans they wished they'd taken it now.

2. Gareth Evans. Money, no problem. Location, no problem. Bradford beat us on the basis of a simple like-for-like choice.

3. Curtis Allen. Stayed at home to be near his mammy.

So only 33% was due to one of CC's choices.
VIVE LA REVOLUTION!
User avatar
Posh
 
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Everywhere and nowhere baby

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby heysham_mfc » Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:19 pm

we should sign Jason Scotland
'I though Swansea was in England I was shocked when I found out that it was in Wales'
heysham_mfc
 
Posts: 5320
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:22 pm
Location: Heysham

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Harry » Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Posh wrote:
Christies Child wrote:Is it because we are not prepared to meet some of the inflated wage demands asked; is it a geographical proble; or is it a combination of the two?


I think the facts should speak for themselves. To my knowledge we've so far missed out on three strikers.

1. Michael Gash. Offered our limit, which was turned down by their unusual setup. So money but according to their fans they wished they'd taken it now.

2. Gareth Evans. Money, no problem. Location, no problem. Bradford beat us on the basis of a simple like-for-like choice.

3. Curtis Allen. Stayed at home to be near his mammy.

So only 33% was due to one of CC's choices.


66% :P
User avatar
Harry
 
Posts: 1343
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: Lancaster

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby marky No.1 » Tue Jul 07, 2009 3:25 pm

heysham_mfc wrote:we should sign Jason Scotland
'I though Swansea was in England I was shocked when I found out that it was in Wales'


He's very much out of our League (or even 3 Leagues!) Swansea have already turned down £1M

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... r_scotland
Enjoy yourself.... It is later than you think
User avatar
marky No.1
 
Posts: 22257
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Carnforth

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby shrimper » Tue Jul 07, 2009 3:37 pm

Aye... but I think he meant that 'geography' wouldn't be an issue with him, such is his (lack of) grasp of the subject.
Is the glass half full or half empty? Mmmm? hard to say - but it does look like there's room for more beer!
User avatar
shrimper
 
Posts: 4870
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:36 pm
Location: Morecambe

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby badger » Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:19 pm

we will end up with a couple of donkeys , like last year. :lol: :lol: :lol:
badger
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:00 pm

Re: Money or Geography?

Postby Posh » Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:26 pm

Harry wrote:
Posh wrote:
Christies Child wrote:Is it because we are not prepared to meet some of the inflated wage demands asked; is it a geographical proble; or is it a combination of the two?


I think the facts should speak for themselves. To my knowledge we've so far missed out on three strikers.

1. Michael Gash. Offered our limit, which was turned down by their unusual setup. So money but according to their fans they wished they'd taken it now.

2. Gareth Evans. Money, no problem. Location, no problem. Bradford beat us on the basis of a simple like-for-like choice.

3. Curtis Allen. Stayed at home to be near his mammy.

So only 33% was due to one of CC's choices.


66% :P


On a rounding-up or nearest decimal basis it would of course be 67%. CC though said 'geography or money' and in Gash's case he might well have moved but didn't get the chance. Curtis Allen might well be geography but he did play at Bournemouth for two years, so I just think he's a big sissy wuffy puffy type for bottling another move.

So in summary 39.37%
VIVE LA REVOLUTION!
User avatar
Posh
 
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Everywhere and nowhere baby


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 104 guests