Abbo wrote:And whats wrong with hanging paedophiles ??
Should we hang them in public?
Abbo wrote:And whats wrong with hanging paedophiles ??
Keith wrote:Abbo wrote:Paedophiles are the scum of the earth, hang them !!! and anyone that disagrees are as bad as them.
Oh dear. You probably agreed with George Bush when he suggested that 'if you aren't with us, you're a terrorist'?
One victim of sexual abuse that I clearly remember working with (I'm a Registered Mental Nurse) was a young teenager. She had disclosed abuse and her father ended up in prison. Abuse has a strange knock on effect that unless you have experience of it, can appear to defy logic. In this instance, the mother denied it had ever happened. She couldn't face the fact that her husband had had sex with her daughter. The impact upon her own sexuality, the impact of someone she loved doing 'that' was beyond her ability to accept. So she denied it entirely and accused her 'evil bitch' of a daughter of 'making it up'. Her siblings obviously agreed with their mother, why wouldn't they? Their mother & father both denied it, it couldn't be true. They lost their father to prison and with no main 'bread winner', they lost the house and ended up in a council house.
This poor kid has not only faced being raped, she's now ostracised within her own family. While she was on the psychiatric unit she actually said that she wished she'd never disclosed the abuse... it was easier to be raped than go through what she was going through afterwards. I'm not sure it helped or not when her sister later disclosed that she'd been raped too.
Now would this girl have been more or less likely to disclose abuse if she knew her father was going to die? I'm pretty sure that she would have been even more likely to suffer in silence. The vast majority of abusers are known to the family. In a massive amount of cases the relationship between the abusers and the victim of the abuse is otherwise positive... "this is our secret, if you tell anyone daddy will die"... will that keep the secrets for longer?
If you've had young people or adults disclose sexual abuse to you, you will have realised that this isn't a subject that has easy answers. The fact that the fascist party think that there are easy, 'populist' answers suggest that they haven't got the slightest clue what the real questions are.
DawZi wrote:Keith wrote:Abbo wrote:Paedophiles are the scum of the earth, hang them !!! and anyone that disagrees are as bad as them.
Oh dear. You probably agreed with George Bush when he suggested that 'if you aren't with us, you're a terrorist'?
One victim of sexual abuse that I clearly remember working with (I'm a Registered Mental Nurse) was a young teenager. She had disclosed abuse and her father ended up in prison. Abuse has a strange knock on effect that unless you have experience of it, can appear to defy logic. In this instance, the mother denied it had ever happened. She couldn't face the fact that her husband had had sex with her daughter. The impact upon her own sexuality, the impact of someone she loved doing 'that' was beyond her ability to accept. So she denied it entirely and accused her 'evil bitch' of a daughter of 'making it up'. Her siblings obviously agreed with their mother, why wouldn't they? Their mother & father both denied it, it couldn't be true. They lost their father to prison and with no main 'bread winner', they lost the house and ended up in a council house.
This poor kid has not only faced being raped, she's now ostracised within her own family. While she was on the psychiatric unit she actually said that she wished she'd never disclosed the abuse... it was easier to be raped than go through what she was going through afterwards. I'm not sure it helped or not when her sister later disclosed that she'd been raped too.
Now would this girl have been more or less likely to disclose abuse if she knew her father was going to die? I'm pretty sure that she would have been even more likely to suffer in silence. The vast majority of abusers are known to the family. In a massive amount of cases the relationship between the abusers and the victim of the abuse is otherwise positive... "this is our secret, if you tell anyone daddy will die"... will that keep the secrets for longer?
If you've had young people or adults disclose sexual abuse to you, you will have realised that this isn't a subject that has easy answers. The fact that the fascist party think that there are easy, 'populist' answers suggest that they haven't got the slightest clue what the real questions are.
so your idea is just send them to prison for a couple of years, brilliant deterrent..
...and I said that where?
DawZi wrote:...and I said that where?
OK then you not for hanging them, and i don't think sending them to prison for 2yrs after raping a child is right.
shall we agree to castrate them? like none liberal people would have done ?
Abbo wrote:Paedophiles are the scum of the earth, hang them !!! and anyone that disagrees are as bad as them.
Abbo wrote:Paedophiles are the scum of the earth, hang them !!! and anyone that disagrees are as bad as them.
Abbo wrote:Go easy there DawZi it appears we have some people that may not agree with our opinions, dont be upsetting them now
Abbo wrote:Outsider and Durhamshrimp you should be ashamed of yourselfs !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DawZi wrote:good topic though, best one ive seen on here so far
Abbo wrote:And whats wrong with hanging paedophiles ??
DawZi wrote:in fairness after reading the above, the only thing in common is there both and obviously right-wing, there's still no argument or "PROOF" that the BNP would go to the extreme in this day and age like the Nazi party by ethnic cleansing and invade Europe
Aspers wrote:It has to be proved 100%, not beyond reasonable Doubt but 100%.
Then put the paedo's to sleep, we don't need or want them.
We don't need to hang them or punish them just kill them quickly and quietly.
outsider wrote:Aspers wrote:It has to be proved 100%, not beyond reasonable Doubt but 100%.
if " It has been proved 100%, not beyond reasonable Doubt but 100%."
why is it that someone with socially liberal views (in the modern sense) are always labelled as 'do gooders' by those of a right-wing persuasion?
DawZi wrote:and why is it if somebody who as a opinion untowards the immigration problem in the UK or finds Bernard Manning jokes funny and supports England is made to feel ashamed to wear England colours with pride whether it be football rugby or cricket
DawZi wrote:extremist left-wingers will have people think that the above are just morons & racist
extremist left-wingers will have people think that the above are just morons & racist
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Keith and 114 guests