shrimper wrote:Players adapt to all sorts of different conditions, competitions and formats and learn how to play in whatever competition they're in.
So that's why there are one-day specialists who'll never get selected for a Test match.
And class batsmen who probably cringe at not being able to play themselves in.
And class bowlers who really wish they could bowl a yorker each delivery.
shrimper wrote:When they're in a five-dayer, they know they need to build an innings - and a bowler knows he can vary his pace and line over the span of a few overs in order to coax a batsman into playing a shot that will get him a wicket.
Exactly, which is why the game is so absorbing.
shrimper wrote:
In the shorter version there's less time and each ball, or each run takes on a greater significance. Batters have to hit the ground running and bowlers have to keep it tight - a dot ball is nearly as good as a wicket.
Slogget with all your might, hope for contact, any contact, but the meatier the better.
shrimper wrote:In my opinion, a lot of the detractors are criticising it because they think they should.
In my case it's to make the thread run a bit longer