The Red Knight wrote:I think Sammy will be proved right as he was with Jon Newby who turned out to be a poor player who did a decent job for us as a "super sub" but was never anything better than that, as is the case with O'Carroll.
Christies Child wrote:The Red Knight wrote:I think Sammy will be proved right as he was with Jon Newby who turned out to be a poor player who did a decent job for us as a "super sub" but was never anything better than that, as is the case with O'Carroll.
Wonder where we would have been without Newby's goals?
Christies Child wrote:
Wonder where we would have been without Newby's goals?
Christies Child wrote:The Red Knight wrote:I think Sammy will be proved right as he was with Jon Newby who turned out to be a poor player who did a decent job for us as a "super sub" but was never anything better than that, as is the case with O'Carroll.
Wonder where we would have been without Newby's goals?
The Red Knight wrote:More or less the same position we were. Of his 6 league goals three of them came in the same game against a Rotherham side who had given up due to not being paid any money.
I honestly don't see where this idea that Newby was some under used football genius comes from. He's only scored 41 goals in his entire career.
james456 wrote:He wasn't great but he was the best striker at the club - although thats saying more about the rest of the strikeforce.
The Red Knight wrote:james456 wrote:He wasn't great but he was the best striker at the club - although thats saying more about the rest of the strikeforce.
Twiss was and is better.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 112 guests