RedRedWine wrote:Geraldine Smith is an uninformed publicity hound. She'll support anything that the most vociferous (which is often a minority...he who shouts loudest etc) group of the moment supports (bet she wants the dome!). Prime example is her congruence with the NIMBYS on the bypass stance, which is to the detriment of the area as a whole. What she stands for can be canvassed by reading prominent points of the day in the press. This way, she'll always keep her seat.
matty wrote:Can we have a seperate part of the board for politics/anything Posh posts on section please.
matty wrote:Can we have a seperate part of the board for politics/anything Posh posts on section please.
Peter wrote:Anything local is always interesting.
But when it gets to the point of basically bullying then there isn't much point in contributing.
Jumping Jack Flash38 wrote:It is good to see such good partnership between Coun Evelyn Archer and our M.P Geraldine Smith. Gerladine offten states thats she has seen more positive results from the currant administration than any of the Labour administrations.
Jumping Jack Flash38 wrote:One think in Geraldines favour is that she acts from the bottom of her heart.
Gnasher wrote:Sorry CC, I'm looking for someone to make statements for me, not ask questions
Heysham_Shrimp wrote:marky wrote:The reason I mentioned Ben Wallace was the fact that he's the only member of the top 5 not to represent a Scottish constituency. I can almost understand Lib Dem Alistair Carmichael being in third when you consider he represents Shetland & Orkney!! Given The Telegraph is a Tory paper I won't give them much credence but it's worth pointing out that Philip Hollobone (Tory MP for Kettering) is the exception rather than the rule. I seem to recall he doesn't employ any researchers, nor does he have a secretary. Of course, I bet The Torygraph didn't make a big play of the fact 3 of the top 5 frugal MPs are of the Labour persuasion (one of whom is as left-wing as they get, Dennis Skinner).bigreddog wrote:According to the Sunday Telegraph and Bloomberg, that's not right. They recon the expenses were: £152,251 for Wallace and £148,849 for Smith.
Those were the figures for 2006/2007. Somehow they managed to spend an extra £47,000 between them in 2007/2008!
In the interests of balance it should be stated that Mr Wallace's expenses included an additional amount of £9,512 in respect of Maternity Cover. Without this Mr Wallace's total expenses would have been less than Miss Smiths although both would still be grossly extravagant.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 41 guests