Gnasher wrote:David Whittaker knew what went on;
http://www.lakelandecho.co.uk/morecambe ... 5116180.jp
bigreddog wrote:you're right about the paper only having a list. I remember the days when the visitor and guardian would do profiles of all the candidates so you could see who they were and what their background was. much better IMO.
Heysham_Shrimp wrote:The root of the problem is that Morecambe should have its own proper Council and not a Parish Council.
You could do a graph showing the decline in Morecambe's prosperity etc from 1974 when Lancaster CC took us in.
Why the hell should Lancaster's Green Party Coucillors be allowed to veto or affect Morecambe planning decisions.
Callum wrote:Perhaps it's because I'm from a different generation but I don't understand why we're so desperate for the winter gardens to be renovated. Don't get me wrong it's got a tremendous history to it but surely once it's all done up it would just fail like the Dome across the road. I can't imagine it would attract top shows or acts and I find it hard to justify any expense on it.
Posh wrote:Callum wrote:Perhaps it's because I'm from a different generation but I don't understand why we're so desperate for the winter gardens to be renovated. Don't get me wrong it's got a tremendous history to it but surely once it's all done up it would just fail like the Dome across the road. I can't imagine it would attract top shows or acts and I find it hard to justify any expense on it.
I disagree in that I believe there is a role for a multi-purpose venue - entertainment of all types; a conference venue with different setups; possibly a museum; and a variety of other workable space. Yes there would be a need some public sector involvement. The council could close the Dome and The Platform, and move the TIC as they've done with The Storey in Lancaster. Some of the cost savings could transfer into The Winter Gardens. Take the Floral Pavillion in New Brighton http://www.floralpavilion.com/, which really shows what a multi-purpose venue can achieve.
However, I simply don't believe that the people in charge of the Winter Gardens project have the skills or capabilities to put together the kind of plan needed. I know first hand how they've rejected offers of help and assistance from skilled and knowledgeable people (from free fundraising to the free use of surveyors) in order to retain their tight closed shop. So far its been nothing short of a disaster. Britain's oldest jumble sale bailed out by politicians from Lancaster and the wills of a few old dears.
Posh wrote:Heysham_Shrimp wrote:The root of the problem is that Morecambe should have its own proper Council and not a Parish Council.
You could do a graph showing the decline in Morecambe's prosperity etc from 1974 when Lancaster CC took us in.
Why the hell should Lancaster's Green Party Coucillors be allowed to veto or affect Morecambe planning decisions.
Well done. You've simply repeated the MBIs arguments that its all the fault of Lancaster. Of course it had nothing to do with landlords and hoteliers who turned away guests in their thousands when they were full of construction workers from the two power plants; nothing to do with the growth in overseas travel that saw millions going abroad instead of holidaying at home and a decline that affected every other seaside resort in the country; and nothing to do with well to put in bluntly the Morecambe moaners willing to blame everyone but themselves and get on with investing their own money and effort into initiatives that work instead of relying on governments of all kinds to do it for them.
Remember also that the biggest investment in Morecambe has come through parties and groups led by Lancaster politicians. The Labour Group from 1993-97 loaned Morecambe FC £200K to build the North Stand and loaned (subsequently written off because they couldn't repay it) the Winter Gardens £181K to make it waterproof. The Labour-Lib-Dem-Green coalition from 2001-2005 built Morecambe's first new toilets for over a half a century; built a splashpark at Happy Mount Park from the sale of land in Lancaster; got the funds to get the Midland refurbished; backed an M6 link so we got something delivered; and did so much more which benefited Morecambe.
In the intervening years 1997-2001 a council led by a Morecambe party made up of Morecambrians gave us ...errrr.... an ALDI on Morecambe promenade. They cancelled one festival; downloaded porn on to a council computer etc. etc.
And now they're one of the largest parties their ... errr... subsidising a white elephant called The Dome to allow people to watch second-rate entertainment for mainly local people by taking money from our children - playground maintenenance slashed; summer activities budgets slashed; leisure centres budgets slashed. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Even worse they now want to bail them out to the tune of hundreds of thousands on the Winter Gardens, because they've been so utterly useless at getting the Winter Gardens restored so far. Yet now someone else (national government) has provided a pot of money they can go for, they still think we've got to support a loss-making building. FFS come up with a business plan that works and not some imbecilic venture that will lead yet again to its closure.
Morecambe people wake up!
Heysham_Shrimp wrote:
Well Done
I was explaining why the Morecambe Bay Independents have had so much success in elections.
There is a perception that Morecambe has been starved of investment to the benefit of Lancaster. The illuminations were scrapped on the understanding that this funding was used for festivals which have subsequently also been cancelled.
The MBI are a very useful place for people to "protest vote" and that will be the case yet again.
clayton wrote:I have not slagged any party off; you can’t say resident first are not political when they are all member of the labour party. David Needham may not be an activist I apologise for that but he is a member of labour and has stood before
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 82 guests