Hodgie1978 wrote:https://twitter.com/BBCLancsSport/status/1646522582588624899?s=20
BerlinWaller wrote:Hodgie1978 wrote:https://twitter.com/BBCLancsSport/status/1646522582588624899?s=20
The biggest Anorak stepped up to the plate!
Hodgie1978 wrote:Maybe he was promised a league 1 budget with a league 1 training ground but he hasn't been given anything.
CityShrimp wrote:Call me thick but I don’t quite get what it is that he’s ‘raging’ about and why he feels let down (aside from maybe the single incidence of late payment of wages)…
Ultimately the club is up for sale and we’re going through the process. It’s taking a bit longer than we thought and might be stressful but how does that make him feel let down, and let down by whom? He’s got a tough job in terms of no budget but he knew that when he took the role.
There must just be a lot that’s happened behind the scenes that we don’t know about?
CityShrimp wrote:Call me thick but I don’t quite get what it is that he’s ‘raging’ about and why he feels let down (aside from maybe the single incidence of late payment of wages)…
Ultimately the club is up for sale and we’re going through the process. It’s taking a bit longer than we thought and might be stressful but how does that make him feel let down, and let down by whom? He’s got a tough job in terms of no budget but he knew that when he took the role.
There must just be a lot that’s happened behind the scenes that we don’t know about?
KenH wrote:His player budget has been reduced and he hasn't been given the budget he was promised when he took the role. And yes, a lot has happened behind the scenes that hasn't yet been made public.
Keith wrote:The only "people above" Derek, are the board, so board members have said 'they' have let him down?
KenH wrote:Keith wrote:The only "people above" Derek, are the board, so board members have said 'they' have let him down?
The owners stand above the Board. So, the owners have let both the Board and Manager down. The Board have both hands tied behind their backs just as much as Derek has his tied.
Andy D wrote:Derek did say in that interview he refers to(ranting) a few months back (the previous manager had been backed and he hadn't been backed) assuming with money being promised.
I like Derek and feel all season we've only been a couple of players away from being a good L1 team.
KenH wrote:CityShrimp wrote:Call me thick but I don’t quite get what it is that he’s ‘raging’ about and why he feels let down (aside from maybe the single incidence of late payment of wages)…
Ultimately the club is up for sale and we’re going through the process. It’s taking a bit longer than we thought and might be stressful but how does that make him feel let down, and let down by whom? He’s got a tough job in terms of no budget but he knew that when he took the role.
There must just be a lot that’s happened behind the scenes that we don’t know about?
His player budget has been reduced and he hasn't been given the budget he was promised when he took the role. And yes, a lot has happened behind the scenes that hasn't yet been made public.
Wild Bill wrote:I think there's more going on behind the scenes than just Derek not getting the transfer budget promised at interview or one missed payrol. I think we will miss this guy when he's gone and worry we are in big trouble next season and beyond. And I am usually very positive
BerlinWaller wrote:Radio Lancs have followed up their insightful interview with Derek by interviewing everybody's favourite, Patreon charging, Agent mouthpiece Alan Nixon. It is a bit of a car crash really pinning our woes on not "cashing in" on Cole Stockton.
Andy D wrote:BerlinWaller wrote:Radio Lancs have followed up their insightful interview with Derek by interviewing everybody's favourite, Patreon charging, Agent mouthpiece Alan Nixon. It is a bit of a car crash really pinning our woes on not "cashing in" on Cole Stockton.
Cole Stockton, its like we just sat around waiting for offers when in hindsight we should of been offering him to clubs in the summer in order to get a replacement.
Gone_Shrimping wrote:It's easy to say we should have let him transfer after scoring 4 or 5 goals all season.
Little Shrimp wrote:Stockton should have done what Lavelle did - fair enough not signing a new contract, but get your head down and keep performing. Puts the ball in our court, and eventually we got a fair bid for Lavelle.
Instead, his ridiculous tantrum tactics to force through a below value move shifted the focus towards us standing up for ourselves and not being bullied. Ludicrous behaviour, he should be fuming at whoever advised him at the time. Another decent season and he'd have had top League One clubs chucking £4k/£5k a week at him. But now, he's a 'flash in the pan' player at this level who'll probably have to get the begging bowl out at Port Vale or something. He's shot himself in the foot just as much as he's damaged our chances this season.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 39 guests