Andy D wrote:should be a good do, but don't think i can be messed going to the trouble with that covid flow test malarkey.
Andy D wrote:should be a good do, but don't think i can be messed going to the trouble with that covid flow test malarkey.
Keith wrote:Andy D wrote:should be a good do, but don't think i can be messed going to the trouble with that covid flow test malarkey.
...but you of course fully support the club for demanding the "covid flow test malarkey" when you consider the potential damage to the club if the manager and other club officials became infected just before the season kicked off...
Andy D wrote:Keith wrote:Andy D wrote:should be a good do, but don't think i can be messed going to the trouble with that covid flow test malarkey.
...but you of course fully support the club for demanding the "covid flow test malarkey" when you consider the potential damage to the club if the manager and other club officials became infected just before the season kicked off...
yeah, i have to do weekly sometimes daily tests at work and wear masks working shifts in extremely hot conditions, and just want normality in my own time.
RapidShrimp wrote:Andy D wrote:yeah, i have to do weekly sometimes daily tests at work and wear masks working shifts in extremely hot conditions, and just want normality in my own time.
I’d argue doing the odd test for personal events IS normality.
Zippy wrote:I see the bigger (comparative) societal risk as buying into the idea of a bio-security underclass , and exclusion of sections of society who cannot or don't want to submit to medical procedures to engage in normal activity
Hopefully a 2019 return to normal society but not a 2019 return to the football!Keith wrote:Zippy wrote:I see the bigger (comparative) societal risk as buying into the idea of a bio-security underclass , and exclusion of sections of society who cannot or don't want to submit to medical procedures to engage in normal activity
Sadly, I suspect this will become the 'new normal' for quite some time and I suspect we will soon find that some things will involve testing for a long time to come. For example, we will no doubt soon have to undergo a test before being allowed to visit someone in hospital.
That self-exclusion by people who don't want to be tested will be like people who repeatedly got stopped for not wearing a seatbelt or crash helmet, as they objected to the government's imposition. Fingers crossed, in a couple of years time, the virus will be less damaging and we'll return to 2019... hopefully.
Zippy wrote:I see the bigger (comparative) societal risk as buying into the idea of a bio-security underclass , and exclusion of sections of society who cannot or don't want to submit to medical procedures to engage in normal activity
Keith wrote:Fingers crossed, in a couple of years time, the virus will be less damaging and we'll return to 2019... hopefully.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], redrobo and 113 guests