Christies Child wrote:
Long may it continue. It's a refreshing change from some of the US inspired crap we have to put up with.
Aal wrote:It worries me that so many of you stick up for a TV prog that is basically TRASH.
That's the point, not the trash bit, it's a TV programme. It's there for entertainment. There is this magical thing for stuff you don't like, it's called a "remote control" now, this thing allows you to change the channel. Or just switch the TV off.
kells wrote:That's the point, not the trash bit, it's a TV programme. It's there for entertainment. There is this magical thing for stuff you don't like, it's called a "remote control" now, this thing allows you to change the channel. Or just switch the TV off.
But it's a TV programme you have to pay for whether you like it or not.
marky wrote:Aal, the BBC is there to cater for all tastes. If you don't like it, tough! You don't have to watch it. Even with freeview, there are plenty of channels to choose from. I don't watch it, but The Apprentice has proven to be extremely popular and thus, as far as the BBC are concerned, is easily value for money.
marky wrote:I'm afraid your views on the show in question are entirely subjective, though. You might think it is trash but millions don't. Also, just because you think something to be the case, doesn't mean you are right.
I dont like The Apprentice, Eastenders, Panorama, Watchdog, Countryfile, Master Chef, The One Show and many many more. However you cannot pick and choose which programs you pay for in any format so why should the licence fee be any different, unless you are suggesting that the BBC should be pay per view? And if that were the case how would the radio be funded?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Redalert1970 and 131 guests