al1 wrote:Please remind me how many games have we won from the last 12!
Freez wrote:Ok. I get you are new here, but there is already a thread saying the same thing active, so ill be wiping this one, shortly.
Please don’t complain about your civil rights being infringed, you are welcome to post your views on the thread. Just in the one already addressing this point.
al1 wrote:Entitled to their opinion, which I and many others share! Trouble is that the mods on both sites are more or less the same people,and are trying to protect their mate.I want to protect the club!
al1 wrote:Did not take long for Port Vale to find a new manager,about 4 days! Plenty more fish in the sea
Keith wrote:al1 wrote:Did not take long for Port Vale to find a new manager,about 4 days! Plenty more fish in the sea
No-one is saying we wouldn't 'find' another manager. The debate should be around how good a job Jim has done compared to someone else. Could someone else put up with all the off-field trauma that we have been through in the last few years? Players (& management) repeatedly not being paid? Jim apparently agreeing to re-sign Devitt & Miller, only for a director to decide to reduce their pay, and offer them less than they'd been on the season before? No-one knowing who owned the club? No training facilities? Ever reduced budget? Best player sold for less than he was worth in order to pay players? etc... etc... etc...
You mention Port Vale as an example. They've had nine managers in the time that we've only had Jim. In that time, they've had one promotion & one relegation, last season finishing in 20th place in League Two despite an average attendance of 4,583.
Changing managers doesn't necessarily bring success. Chopping & changing managers frequently brings failure. Look at Notts County. Surely you aren't suggesting that we're as big as County or Vale? Look at the clubs that are bigger than us but been relegated while we've stayed up.
What do you think we should be doing on our budget & facilities?
BerlinWaller wrote:Chelsea chop and change their Manager every 2 years or so and they haven't done too badly have they?
Keith wrote:BerlinWaller wrote:Chelsea chop and change their Manager every 2 years or so and they haven't done too badly have they?
If Jim had their money, I'd expect a bit better than a League Two dogfight each season! I think if I had their money, I could at least manage mid-table!
BerlinWaller wrote:
But they are competing against other clubs who have lots of money are they not?
RedRampage wrote:Bentley SHOULD walk, but he isn't going to walk away from 80k a year is he?
BoroRedShrimp wrote:I expected alot better league position this season than last.
Seasider9601 wrote:RedRampage wrote:Bentley SHOULD walk, but he isn't going to walk away from 80k a year is he?
Just wondering, how do you know that figure out of interest?
Slanester wrote:Seasider9601 wrote:RedRampage wrote:Bentley SHOULD walk, but he isn't going to walk away from 80k a year is he?
Just wondering, how do you know that figure out of interest?
Don’t hold your breath S9601.
BerlinWaller wrote:But they are competing against other clubs who have lots of money are they not?
al1 wrote:Did not take long for Port Vale to find a new manager,about 4 days! Plenty more fish in the sea
Keith wrote:BerlinWaller wrote:But they are competing against other clubs who have lots of money are they not?
Kind of my point! We’re competing against teams who have lots of money (relative to us) while we’ve not got any cash. Chopping & changing managers won’t change that.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 131 guests