Christies Child wrote: but pay out more on better players from the financial savings of having a smaller squad?
campdave wrote:Christies Child wrote: but pay out more on better players from the financial savings of having a smaller squad?
I think we'd rather have "better" players, but who's to say we can get them? Andy Kirk wasn't interested.
Simply Ned wrote:Next season, should we operate on an 18 man squad but pay out more on better players from the financial savings of having a smaller squad?
Have we not learned anything from the much publicised League 2 survival/promotion manual as demonstrated by Darlington, Accrington, Hereford from last season etc etc. Their well tried and tested formula to cover all angles, embargos, avoid being stuck with under achievers, is to have a small squad and maximise the loan system. Was it not Dave Penny who recently stated that he had used 15 loan players this season and said this was the only logical way for the vast majority of teams in league 2 to compete.
marky wrote:We need a well balanced squad of 20 next season as opposed to the completely disjointed squad of 24 we had for this season.
marky wrote:We need a well balanced squad of 20 next season as opposed to the completely disjointed squad of 24 we had for this season.
Harry wrote:marky wrote:We need a well balanced squad of 20 next season as opposed to the completely disjointed squad of 24 we had for this season.
Agreed. Plus a couple of quality loans here and there to put a bit of fire up certain players' rear ends.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 16 guests