Christies Child wrote:Hell I know that I can annoy people with some of my posts but Neds has sunk to the lowest depth ever. Yesterday I was in support of some of his comments. Today the complete opposite.
I've got every faith in the Board and PMcG to have looked at all options before deciding to offer it to Jim.
Simply Ned wrote:Christies Child wrote:Hell I know that I can annoy people with some of my posts but Neds has sunk to the lowest depth ever. Yesterday I was in support of some of his comments. Today the complete opposite.
I've got every faith in the Board and PMcG to have looked at all options before deciding to offer it to Jim.
Of course PM looked at all options and all I have done is explain to you why he reached the decision. I have more experience on PM's decison making than any of the current SV posters. If you choose incorrectly to believe it as negativity then you and the rest of the no brainers bring a whole new meaning to naievity. I do resent any suggestion that I am not a supporter as my family has put more finance into the club then any of you `flat world believers'. I will accept misguided criticism from most of the no brainers on here except that fool from the IOM.
Simply Ned wrote:Christies Child wrote:Hell I know that I can annoy people with some of my posts but Neds has sunk to the lowest depth ever. Yesterday I was in support of some of his comments. Today the complete opposite.
I've got every faith in the Board and PMcG to have looked at all options before deciding to offer it to Jim.
Of course PM looked at all options and all I have done is explain to you why he reached the decision. I have more experience on PM's decison making than any of the current SV posters. If you choose incorrectly to believe it as negativity then you and the rest of the no brainers bring a whole new meaning to naievity. I do resent any suggestion that I am not a supporter as my family has put more finance into the club then any of you `flat world believers'. I will accept misguided criticism from most of the no brainers on here except that fool from the IOM.
Simply Ned wrote:I do resent any suggestion that I am not a supporter as my family has put more finance into the club then any of you `flat world believers'. I will accept misguided criticism from most of the no brainers on here except that fool from the IOM.
Keith wrote:Oh, and the 'run through walls', look at Liverpool. Dalglish has basically the same players but they now know that they have to be 100% committed or they will be dropped/out. Suddenly the same players were at the top of the form guide. The 'problem' in modern football is too many with an 'I'm better' attitude. We've had a few of those this season. If those players are allowed to remain, they will be leaving their ego's at the door.
shrimpnsave wrote:So which are you Sharpy? A 'flat earther' or a 'No brainer'?
Are you calling my mate not the sharpest tool in the box
ezz wrote:Did you nick that from my post in another thread??
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 123 guests