The Bay wrote:Sammy -
http://www.thebay.co.uk/goto.php?sess=+ ... F&id=23428
Paz -
http://www.thebay.co.uk/goto.php?sess=+ ... F&id=23429
sardineleader wrote:quote i brought him to the club
dont you mean he was paid up at bury and he asked
if he could train with us to keep fit then sammy signs him up
not got a good goal scoring record since he left to go to carlise
6 goals in 4 years money wasted me thinks we need a proven goal
scorer jevons is a waste of space
Morecambe Jack wrote:You can't pick up a proven league 2 striker for nothing and on a free transfer as everyone is expecting Sammy to do! It is impossible especially with our budget. The cheque book might be required this summer...
DawZi wrote:sardineleader wrote:quote i brought him to the club
dont you mean he was paid up at bury and he asked
if he could train with us to keep fit then sammy signs him up
not got a good goal scoring record since he left to go to carlise
6 goals in 4 years money wasted me thinks we need a proven goal
scorer jevons is a waste of space
i have never really taken to Jevons he's not physical enough you have to put the ball on a plate for him, and even then he needs 4 chances to score 1 goal..
it wouldn't bother me if i never seen him in a Moecambe shirt again.
Morecambe Jack wrote:I don't care how many players we have on the books - we don't know how much they are being paid but we do know Sammy works within the budget given to him by the board (as he frequently says he has to let people go before bringing new faces in). So long as he does that, I don't care.
Anyone with half a brain would realise however, that it is impossible that we will have a budget anywhere near that of the "bigger" clubs in this league with much higher attendences e.g. Bradford, Port Vale etc etc... So, if there is any player who is proven at this level, they are going to go to those clubs before us for bigger wages. Hence, we will never get a proven striker at this level.
Morecambe Jack wrote:I reiterate, as long as Sammy sticks to the budget given to him by the Board, there is not an argument here.
mrpotatohead wrote:sammy mac is not a popular manager amongst his peers coz he shafted his mate jim harvey simple, he is lucky to have a long contract and a nice boss, this will be his last job as a manager in league footy, he should, but will not, do the decent thing, and stand down, thats me off the fence
Morecambe Jack wrote:If you are refering to this: http://www.morecambe.vitalfootball.co.u ... p?a=221017 then yes. But £1,500 is hardly significant is it?
The Fury wrote: Whilst this may be the case regarding Capaldi, one issue I would have is why we have never been able to utilise Sammy's very public (he scuttles off to MUTV at least twice a week) association with Manchester United?
james456 wrote:The Fury wrote: Whilst this may be the case regarding Capaldi, one issue I would have is why we have never been able to utilise Sammy's very public (he scuttles off to MUTV at least twice a week) association with Manchester United?
Also, why did we never see any loanees come from Blackburn Rovers whilst their reserves were playing at CP?
The Fury wrote:Morecambe Jack wrote:If you are refering to this: http://www.morecambe.vitalfootball.co.u ... p?a=221017 then yes. But £1,500 is hardly significant is it?
The summary on there doesn't put the figures into context, which were considerably higher than those related to the other clubs you describe has having bigger budgets. Seeing as most of what you say is speculation, I would counter by some speculation of my own by arguing that the likes of Capaldi, having dropped from a significantly higher level, will not be on cheap wages.
Another aspect of the debate here is whether Sammy's reputation attracts a certain calibre of player. Whilst this may be the case regarding Capaldi, one issue I would have is why we have never been able to utilise Sammy's very public (he scuttles off to MUTV at least twice a week) association with Manchester United?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 112 guests