I can't believe what I'm reading on this board this week
Calling John Norman
You must be mad or fishing for bites, in which case I apologise I'm biting.
Spot on Hodgy.
Legend.
marky wrote:I think it is equally true that Justin Jackson was the one player who complimented John Norman's supposed attributes. Jackson's pace was crucial to that partnership in that Norman had an incredibly frustrating tendency to overhit passes, etc. Norman was one of those players who, when having an off day (which was more often than I think you care to remember) was unspeakably shocking. There was no middle ground. He doesn't really come close to being anything vaguely suggestive of one of our best ever players. He wouldn't get in our reserve team now and I'd go so far to suggest that he wouldn't have stood a chance of getting in our promotion winning conference team either!
marky wrote:As for getting the best out of Jackson, I'd argue that's being terribly unfair on him. They were a partnership and they contributed equally to it. They got the best out of each other.
Sharpy wrote:ok ok, caved in. Rose tinted specs ordered. Very low on stock in the area apparently.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 22 guests