Seasider9601 wrote:Many years ago, Graham Gill suffered at the hands of The Shrimps fans "moaning and a groaning brigade" too, and boy did he suffer from it as I recall.
Sharpy wrote:if id been there id have added to the boos. more so at sammy for bringing him on and insisting on playing him than booing the player himself. paying fans have the right to say what they want about the players and the managers decisions. whats the point in cheering someone who is playing crap? he might decide it means we like what we're seeing which is definitely not the case.
maccawozzagod wrote:half of this thread makes me (as a Stanley fan) laugh, and the other half saddens me...
LOVED AT STANLEY - WATCHED AT MORECAMBE indeed
RedRedWine wrote:Sharpy wrote:if id been there id have added to the boos. more so at sammy for bringing him on and insisting on playing him than booing the player himself. paying fans have the right to say what they want about the players and the managers decisions. whats the point in cheering someone who is playing crap? he might decide it means we like what we're seeing which is definitely not the case.
Say no more.
Bare Ben wrote:I have only just read this thread, I actually avoided it because I thought it was going to be moaning and dross about Mullers. I rate him, even more so as a person. We had an arguement once over what was bigger, my nose or his forehead. In the end we agreed it was my nose.
halftimeresults wrote:Bare Ben wrote:I have only just read this thread, I actually avoided it because I thought it was going to be moaning and dross about Mullers. I rate him, even more so as a person. We had an arguement once over what was bigger, my nose or his forehead. In the end we agreed it was my nose.
But Mullers beat you in the forehead/penis debate
Bare Ben wrote: booing our own players is despicable and something I would never ever contemplate and the culprits should be ashamed of themselves.
marky No.1 wrote: pure bollox
halftimeresults wrote:penis debate
marky wrote:Were they booing Paul Mullin or were they booing Sammy's decision to bring him on? Some may disagree but I do think there's a difference between the two.
marky wrote:Were they booing Paul Mullin or were they booing Sammy's decision to bring him on? Some may disagree but I do think there's a difference between the two. He may be limited somewhat as a footballer these days (happens to all players in their mid 30s, unless you are of the Ryan Giggs or Teddy Sheringham ilk), but I can't see that he's done anything to cause a few fans to boo him personally.
As for Keith's comment re: John Norman, all I can say is that I've no idea why fans around you booed him on that day, but I can say that him leaving on a Bosman had nothing to do with the booing that occurred in the Paddock. That was more a general dislike of him as a footballer, given there were a number of very happy people when he left the first time!
marky wrote:I think it is equally true that Justin Jackson was the one player who complimented John Norman's supposed attributes. Jackson's pace was crucial to that partnership in that Norman had an incredibly frustrating tendency to overhit passes, etc. Norman was one of those players who, when having an off day (which was more often than I think you care to remember) was unspeakably shocking. There was no middle ground. He doesn't really come close to being anything vaguely suggestive of one of our best ever players. He wouldn't get in our reserve team now and I'd go so far to suggest that he wouldn't have stood a chance of getting in our promotion winning conference team either!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], redrobo and 119 guests