Morectalk wrote:Generally a shame that we have to keep going for loan players all the time. I know it is the only viable way for a club like ours to do business, but IMO loan players are only out for no.1 and don't really have the clubs interests at heart.
Aye... but to look at it another way, if a player IS like that by nature, it's better to only have them on loan than, say, signed on a two-year contract being paid a decent amount of money and THEN showing that lack of commitment to the cause.
And even if they ARE only out for themselves, they're only going to a) get into their parent club's first 11 or b) get a move to a bigger club than ours by playing well while they're out on loan.
Is the glass half full or half empty? Mmmm? hard to say - but it does look like there's room for more beer!