Ian Kane wrote:Did anyone see the elderly gentleman have a right go at Sammy at the end ? He slated him with some rather fowl language about his substitution policy. Sammy bit and came over to defend himself and ended up giving as good as he got. "You support the fucking team and I'll fucking manage it" and ended with "If you want me to go I will".
The gentleman in question was out of order but I think Sammys reaction said more. Not happy was an understatement.
outsider wrote:The "gentleman" in question is very vocal both home and away, and I think Sammy was well within his rights, Its about time he showed a bit of passion
thegentlegiant wrote:Ian Kane wrote:Did anyone see the elderly gentleman have a right go at Sammy at the end ? He slated him with some rather fowl language about his substitution policy. Sammy bit and came over to defend himself and ended up giving as good as he got. "You support the fucking team and I'll fucking manage it" and ended with "If you want me to go I will".
The gentleman in question was out of order but I think Sammys reaction said more. Not happy was an understatement.
time is ticking for Sammy, the more fans stop coming and the more the board hear get sammy out the more likely it is going to happen.
If Sammy did the above then for me that is very unprofessional and Sammy should of ignored it IMO
marky wrote:Last time I checked, it wasn't the job of the supporters club to arse lick the manager but to try and facilitate better relations with the football club itself. If people have genuine concerns regarding Sammy then they can air them. Fans of Morecambe is independent from the club, not an extension of it.
ockers wrote:marky wrote:Last time I checked, it wasn't the job of the supporters club to arse lick the manager but to try and facilitate better relations with the football club itself. If people have genuine concerns regarding Sammy then they can air them. Fans of Morecambe is independent from the club, not an extension of it.
imho its part of their remit to fully support the club the manager and the team
Bare Ben wrote:What an absolute tosser, he's not a real fan in my eyes, certainly not a "supporter". Complete tosser.
paulshrimp wrote:I could be slow this morning but I didn't understand Fury's reference to " Animal Farm". Could we let SM get on with managing the team without shouting abuse at him? If at 7 30 last night you had offered Shrimps' fans a point at Stanley they would have taken it.
ezz wrote:There's a difference between questioning the manager and verbally abusing him
The Fury wrote:paulshrimp wrote:I could be slow this morning but I didn't understand Fury's reference to " Animal Farm". Could we let SM get on with managing the team without shouting abuse at him? If at 7 30 last night you had offered Shrimps' fans a point at Stanley they would have taken it.
Pobble wrote:Bare Ben wrote:What an absolute tosser, he's not a real fan in my eyes, certainly not a "supporter". Complete tosser.
Grow up, everyone is entitled to their opinion.!!!!
ockers wrote:The Fury wrote:paulshrimp wrote:I could be slow this morning but I didn't understand Fury's reference to " Animal Farm". Could we let SM get on with managing the team without shouting abuse at him? If at 7 30 last night you had offered Shrimps' fans a point at Stanley they would have taken it.
I certainly wasn't advocating abusing Sammy. Simply, I was likening Ockers' comment that it is part of a supporters' clubs "remit to fully support the manager and the team" to the sheep in Animal Farm blindly following leadership without question.[/quote
If you're going to put yourself up for election to a mfc supporters committee working closely in the future with fans players manager and club then it doesnt seem right to me to be making public personal criticsms of the manager on an internet message board
just my personal opinion...........
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 67 guests