Shrimpsvoices

assuming McReady and Haining are both injured.

Roche

Brown Parrish Scott Capaldi

Fleming Stanley Drummond Rundle or Wilson*

Mullin Jevons

subs

Walker
Wainwright
Duffy
Spencer
Rundle or Wilson *
Hendrie
Cowperthwaite

Roche
Scott Jim Parrish Wilson
Duffy Stanley Drummond Rundle
Mullin Jevons

i disagree with Sammy that tactics are not important so with that in mind i would play
3-4-1-2 on tuesday and play a system that matches the strengths of the players we have.

Roche

Parrish Bentley Scott

Hunter (RWB) Drummond Stanley ( LWB)Wilson

Duffy

Mullin Jevons

the resons for this are simple it can be easily adapted to 4-4-2 with parrish/ wilson switch to LB duffy has a free role is in the gap and will keep their centre halves busy we play better when attacking and we NEED Bentley's Leadership on the pitch with 3 at the back it should compensate for Bentley's lack of pace.

There is no way we can drop Duffy, he's looking so dangerous atm.

Roche
Parrish Scott Bentley Wilson
Duffy Drummond Stanley Rundle
Jevons Mullin (if we use him right. If not Spencer)

Roche
Hunter Parrish Scott Capaldi
Duffy Stanley Drummond Brown
Jevons Mullin

With Spencer coming on for either of the strikers, and Shuker/Rundle for Brown later on.

N Saban wrote:i disagree with Sammy that tactics are not important so with that in mind i would play
3-4-1-2 on tuesday and play a system that matches the strengths of the players we have.

Roche

Parrish Bentley Scott

Hunter (RWB) Drummond Stanley ( LWB)Wilson

Duffy

Mullin Jevons

the resons for this are simple it can be easily adapted to 4-4-2 with parrish/ wilson switch to LB duffy has a free role is in the gap and will keep their centre halves busy we play better when attacking and we NEED Bentley's Leadership on the pitch with 3 at the back it should compensate for Bentley's lack of pace.

Totally agree there. It would allow Wilson to bomb forward and get some decent crosses in. I would maybe take Drummond out for Fleming.

Sammy h wrote:

N Saban wrote:i disagree with Sammy that tactics are not important so with that in mind i would play
3-4-1-2 on tuesday and play a system that matches the strengths of the players we have.

Roche

Parrish Bentley Scott

Hunter (RWB) Drummond Stanley ( LWB)Wilson

Duffy

Mullin Jevons

the resons for this are simple it can be easily adapted to 4-4-2 with parrish/ wilson switch to LB duffy has a free role is in the gap and will keep their centre halves busy we play better when attacking and we NEED Bentley's Leadership on the pitch with 3 at the back it should compensate for Bentley's lack of pace.

Totally agree there. It would allow Wilson to bomb forward and get some decent crosses in. I would maybe take Drummond out for Fleming.

I like that too. Sammy wont go with that after spending money on 'better' players though.

sorry i dont agree but that 3 4 1 2 i cant see working way to much ground for Hunter to cover on that side as a wing-back he would get to exposed for having little legs



back to basics for me 4 4 2 with a lot of last seasons top 4 lineup now because of injuries maybe a blessing?

Roche
Moss Parrish Bentley Wilson
Duffy Drummond Stanley Rundle
Mullin Jevons

DawZi wrote:Roche
Moss Parrish Bentley Wilson
Duffy Drummond Stanley Rundle
Mullin Jevons

Cant see Moss getting in after being payed off, so
Scotty in for him and you have a winner

Roche
Parrish Bentley Scott Wilson
Duffy Stanley Drummond Rundle
Jevons Mullin

I believe the time is right for Jimbo to step on to the turf. Let's get back to who and what we know eh

We can provide the rockets, I'm sure he can light the blue touch paper

Oh and if Jim is "bare bones" then I'm the pope

Matty the Shrimp wrote:

DawZi wrote:Roche
Moss Parrish Bentley Wilson
Duffy Drummond Stanley Rundle
Mullin Jevons

Cant see Moss getting in after being payed off, so
Scotty in for him and you have a winner

yeah thing is i like Scott, but he doesn't look happy at fullback and i think Moss as been a bit unlucky as a scape goat

DawZi wrote:

Matty the Shrimp wrote:

DawZi wrote:Roche
Moss Parrish Bentley Wilson
Duffy Drummond Stanley Rundle
Mullin Jevons

Cant see Moss getting in after being payed off, so
Scotty in for him and you have a winner

yeah thing is i like Scott, but he doesn't look happy at fullback and i think Moss as been a bit unlucky as a scape goat

Swap Parrish out to the right and scott as a centre back?

Since when has Fleming not been the 2nd name on the sheet (behind Roche)?
Best player by miles so far.

Matty the Shrimp wrote:

DawZi wrote:Roche
Moss Parrish Bentley Wilson
Duffy Drummond Stanley Rundle
Mullin Jevons

Cant see Moss getting in after being payed off, so
Scotty in for him and you have a winner

has Moss being paid up been officially announced ?

not seen it anywhere and it would have been an expensive exercise. surely he could have been loaned out if there was no sign of a first team place here.

i cant see people being transfer listed or having there contracts paid up at this stage of the season

but i had heard after them clear the air talks, that SM had had basically said to all the players if you dont like it then find another club

then people were dropped and rumours started

Matty the Shrimp wrote:

DawZi wrote:Roche
Moss Parrish Bentley Wilson
Duffy Drummond Stanley Rundle
Mullin Jevons

Cant see Moss getting in after being payed off, so
Scotty in for him and you have a winner

wikipedia not always right but they have Darren Moss down as one of our players. Maybe he's injured :-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darren_Moss

It's the fascination of following a team... will Jim return? Will Fleming and Rundle come back in?
What about Wilson? Will Parrish stay at centre back? Will Hunter be back on the bench?
Should Brown be in the centre rather than out on the left? Where should Scott play? Should Stanley start? Does Capaldi keep his place? Who would be a manager???

roche
hunter parrish scott capaldi

duffy fleming stanley rundle

shuker

mullin


RED ARMY!!!!!!!!!

bentomlinsonMFC wrote:roche
hunter parrish scott capaldi

duffy fleming stanley rundle

shuker

mullin


RED ARMY!!!!!!!!!

Are you Sammy McIlroy?

Little Shrimp wrote:

bentomlinsonMFC wrote:roche
hunter parrish scott capaldi

duffy fleming stanley rundle

shuker

mullin


RED ARMY!!!!!!!!!

Are you Sammy McIlroy?

The faith in Capaldi, Shuker and Hunter.

Hunter has been class the last few games,those long throws look very dangerous,2 goals in 2 games,shuker looked good behind mulllin

Capaldi's long throw ins are the pretty much the only thing he really adds to the team, Hunter was apalling against Barnet and Shuker just doesn't look good enough

yeah but to be honest with you mate,capaldi has brought 2 goals,goals is what we need.I dont think gaz played well in saturday but other weeks he has been class