O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:06 pmMissing a penalty as the last kick of the game! How gutting is that? He'll probably have to take another one now in the penalty shoot-out!
Come on Ghana!
Come on Ghana!
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:06 pmRe: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:19 pmPoor Asamoah Gyan. That will haunt him for years. Amazing bottle to stand up and take the first penalty in the shoot-out but poor bloke...
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:24 pmI know. He had a great game too. Just shows what pressure does to you. He knew that they were going through to the semis uf he put it in. But as you say to step up 1st in the shoot out showed immense bottle. Great pen too. Why didn't he do that the 1st time.
I'd quite like to see that Uruguayan banned for another match. His actions have kept his side in the tournament when they should really be out. Oh well!
I'd quite like to see that Uruguayan banned for another match. His actions have kept his side in the tournament when they should really be out. Oh well!
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:31 pmShock Horror, a South American uses his hand to change the course of a game!
Felt for the Ghanans, the deserved the win without a doubt.
Felt for the Ghanans, the deserved the win without a doubt.
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:44 pmFallowfield Shrimp wrote:I know. He had a great game too. Just shows what pressure does to you. He knew that they were going through to the semis uf he put it in. But as you say to step up 1st in the shoot out showed immense bottle. Great pen too. Why didn't he do that the 1st time.
I'd quite like to see that Uruguayan banned for another match. His actions have kept his side in the tournament when they should really be out. Oh well!
sorry but why should the Uruguayan get another match ban?
sending off and a penalty is more than enough off a advantage for Ghana.
If anything the Uruguayan is a hero.
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:54 pmscar wrote:Shock Horror, a South American uses his hand to change the course of a game!
Felt for the Ghanans, the deserved the win without a doubt.
err they lost and thats that....
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:00 pmand they knew the rules before the game, if you hand ball on the line preventing a goal scoring chance it results in sending off,1 game ban
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:36 pmBy cheating - and actually suffering the full consequences of his actions as per the rules of the game - his team has still benefitted which is completely unjust.
Ghana were denied a definite goal because of the opposition cheating and the repercussions were that they had a chance to get the goal that was taken from them and suarez was suspended from a game he was never going to play in had he not cheated...
Ghana were denied a definite goal because of the opposition cheating and the repercussions were that they had a chance to get the goal that was taken from them and suarez was suspended from a game he was never going to play in had he not cheated...
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:58 pmIn the Premier League Forlan was on the sidelines and couldn't get a game cos an Englishman was so much better. In the World Cup........ 
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:53 amjames456 wrote:By cheating - and actually suffering the full consequences of his actions as per the rules of the game - his team has still benefitted which is completely unjust.
Ghana were denied a definite goal because of the opposition cheating and the repercussions were that they had a chance to get the goal that was taken from them and suarez was suspended from a game he was never going to play in had he not cheated...
He didn't cheat, it was a simple blatant foul, that unfortunately denied Ghana an absolutely certain match-winning goal. Suarez is getting the statutory punishment.
But it's another law that needs looking at. Referees, in very important matches, should have the discretion to award penalty goals.
As for the penalty attempt. If the crossbar had been 6 inches higher the pill would have been in the roof of the net
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:57 amYes it must have been a difficult pill to swallow
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 7:56 amHe might not have been a cheat but they were cheated.
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:16 amdurhamshrimp wrote:He might not have been a cheat but they were cheated.
All part of the game DS
The rules need looking at so that a team is never denied an absolutely certain goal again by a bog standard hand-ball.
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:22 amWhat other professional wouldn't do the same? It's nice to see somebody put their country first and do whatever it takes to ensure his team get through. Comparing it to the 'hand of god' is just daft.
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:27 amThe attacking team gets a penalty AND the player is automatically sent off. In most cases that would be seen as ample punishment for such 'cheating' as the offending team 'should' concede a goal and be down to ten men.
Just unfortunate that this happened right at the end so the sending off was of little benefit to Ghana, but I don't know how you can sensibly legislate for that.
Just unfortunate that this happened right at the end so the sending off was of little benefit to Ghana, but I don't know how you can sensibly legislate for that.
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:25 amshrimper wrote:Just unfortunate that this happened right at the end so the sending off was of little benefit to Ghana, but I don't know how you can sensibly legislate for that.
Peter wrote:The rules need looking at so that a team is never denied an absolutely certain goal again by a bog standard hand-ball.
Peter wrote:But it's another law that needs looking at. Referees, in very important matches, should have the discretion to award penalty goals.
Re: O/T Uruguay v Ghana
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:56 amAye - fair play, Peter I skimmed through and hadn't spotted you suggesting that. I don't think you could only do it for 'important' games but that'd certainly be worth looking at.