campdave wrote:Wonder what Negative Ned will make of all this
shrimper wrote:That Sammy has at last listened to him?
P/T Indie wrote:"Everything is ok with Stanley. We brought some players in and had a look at them and Craig Stanley is needed at the club."
That quote says it all for me!
Posh wrote:P/T Indie wrote:"Everything is ok with Stanley. We brought some players in and had a look at them and Craig Stanley is needed at the club."
That quote says it all for me!
Absolutely incredibly extraordinary! I'm stunned by that comment.
Could it be read as follows. "We brought some players in and gave them a decent wage and contracts for the next couple of years. We've had a look at them - perhaps not as closely as we should have at their old clubs and in pre-season - but they're not as good as a bloke who I wanted out of the club for calling me everything under the sun and who I've said doesn't contribute enough to our attacking play or score enough goals. Craig Stanley is needed at the club because I've no other options and have had to eat the ol' humble pie."
Christies Child wrote:Whatever the reasons we move on. Certainly not the time for retribution.
All in all an excellent days business....so far!
John L wrote:To me, it reads as if he is referring to the numerous trial players we've had.
John L wrote:Anyway, whatever he meant, all that matters is Craig remains a Morecambe player!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 89 guests