Page 1 of 1

Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:13 pm
by Little Shrimp
I reckon we should stick with:

Roche
Parrish Haining Artell Wilson
Duffy Stanley Drummond Wainwright
Mullin Jevons

Re: Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:18 pm
by james456
Ditto - I'd go with that.

Re: Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:01 pm
by Heysham_Shrimp
ditto

Re: Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:38 pm
by seasonsinthesun
I would think that Sammy will stick with the same starters as against Darlington, but I would like to see Hunter and Panther given some minutes on the pitch. I agree with what Shrimper said some time ago, to the effect that around the 60 to 65 minute mark is often a good time for a substitution, giving the sub more time to make an impact, rather than someone coming on after 86 minutes! However, I have been watching football long enough to know that every game has its own unique scenario, and that's where the manager earns his money.

Re: Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:33 am
by parceldave
Wasn't at Darlo game but against better opposition as in Barnet, Macca, Chesterfield and Accy the midfield was lacking in creativity and protection in front of the back four , which is 1 reason why we have only gained 8pts from a possible 24. Most people have noticed that Gazunter until his recent suspension was probably our most consistant outfield player this season , so why the hell is he not playing , if Man u had the same results as we have recently and Rooney wasn't playing i think questions would be asked . :o . I also think with these recent results that we are missing Jimbo's physical and vocal presence , also M Panther must be close to match fit now , but even if he's only 90% at least he will put the tackles in and not pass sideways so much. So tonight i would like to see -:

......................Roache.......................

Parrish.......Haining.........Bentley.......Wilson

Hunter.......Panther........Drummy.......Wainey

...................Mullin.....Jevo....................

Twissy for Mullin after 70 mins

Otherwise im not going. ;)

Re: Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:12 pm
by Christies Minder
Surely a positive reward for winning is keeping your starting place.

Why change a winning side if you don't have to???

Re: Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:21 pm
by Little Shrimp
parceldave wrote:......................Roache.......................

Parrish.......Haining.........Bentley.......Wilson

Hunter.......Panther........Drummy.......Wainey

...................Mullin.....Jevo....................


I think Hunter's a good player but he's not as good as Duffy on the wing. Wainwright is alot better than Curtis on the wing and I think Curtis is good as a sub for upfront when some fresh legs are needed. Can't understand why you've taken The Moose out of defence, he played solidly on Saturday.

Re: Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:41 pm
by steve mfc
Christies Minder wrote:Surely a positive reward for winning is keeping your starting place.

Why change a winning side if you don't have to???


I don't believe in change just for the sake of it, there are a lot of good points from being able to play the same team.

However i also feel that its important not get complacent just because we have won the last game, if there's room for improvement even to a winning side then i think it should be done, personally i still feel we need strengthen the midfield area to give some more protection to our defence.

Re: Team vs Burton

PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:42 pm
by Caged Lion
Little Shrimp wrote:I reckon we should stick with:

Roche
Parrish Haining Artell Wilson
Duffy Stanley Drummond Wainwright
Mullin Jevons


Agreed...though the new loanee could replace Stanley.