Page 1 of 1

SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:19 pm
by shrimpnsave
todays game.... whats the pos an neg from you fellow shrimps on todays perfomance

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:26 pm
by campdave
Negatives - plenty of easy chances put wide

Positives - good performance from Roche to keep us in it early on
Danny Adams' Ole football near the end

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:32 pm
by Bare bum
Negatives,
    I think we have 2 or 3 better wingers / wide players than the ones who started today
    Woeful finishing
    Woeful referee
    Mullers and Jevvos pace

Positives
    Haining and Artell mostly excellent
    Danny Adams looked like and played like Maradonna when he came on
    2 or 3 excellent saves from Bazza
    Lots of industry from midfield - Stanners and Drummy
    Jevvos football brain

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:41 pm
by George Dawes
positives

Mullin & Jevons is our best option upfront they complement each other

Wainwright's to say he's right footed his left-foot as improved so much and can now go either way round a fullback

oh and 3 points


negatives

subtitutions, when we was 2 up we could have rested some legs and brought fresh ones on

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:58 pm
by james456
Positives -

1. Three points. Everything else is secondary really.
2. The strikeforce coming back into form.
3. Both wingers did well - pleasing to see some pace and trickery from Duffy - just needs more consistency. Wainwright was up for it as well.
4. The defending was reasonably good all in all.

Negatives -

1. Finishing was not great. Jevons missed a couple but you have to cut him some slack as he's just back from injury.
2. At times we lacked just that little bit of creativity. There were occasions where we played decent football to get the ball to the Darlington box but then ran out of ideas.


Overall, we may have to play better against Burton but this is a platform for the players to take confidence from and of course it's a fully deserved three points.

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 6:04 pm
by parkyboy
good result but still need the terrier lhunter in midfield what has SM got against him all of a sudden

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 6:14 pm
by Christies Child
parkyboy wrote:good result but still need the terrier lhunter in midfield what has SM got against him all of a sudden


....a question that I'm sure Gaz would like answering...but he'll only get an answer if he's spoken to...

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 6:51 pm
by Heysham_Shrimp
Positives Stanners and Drummy in great form in midfield.

Paul Mullins link up play with Phil Jevons. on another day Jevs would have scored a
hat-trick.

3 points to take us over 40 point mark.


negatives we should have scored 5 or 6 today. Chances have to be taken.

a poor attendance on a perfect day.

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:55 pm
by matty
Mullin ... is our best option upfront


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:56 pm
by Curly
Positives; Barry Roche, Danny Adams 1920's Footballing Exhibition, Craig Stanley pushing the ref
over :lol: :lol: :lol: ,Getting A Chance To Open The Box.

Negatives; The First Half, No Twiss, No Hunter, Missing Out On £1100 :cry: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:10 pm
by Heysham_Shrimp
matty wrote:
Mullin ... is our best option upfront


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Mullin and Jevons are our best option upfront.

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:14 pm
by heysham_mfc
possitives
3 much needed points
both strikers got a goal each
kept a clean sheet
negatives
it shoulod have been more
Jevons missed a couple of chances and we should have had a 3rd goal from Duffy near the end

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:16 pm
by Bare bum
Nother negative
missing Curly losing £1100 on open the box, if I'd paid attention it might have been the butterfly flapping it's wing on a Pacific Island..............sorry mate :(

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 9:20 pm
by simmy
Positives:

Excellent first goal.
Haining and Roche at the back.
Three Points.
Jevons not playing as a target man.

Negatives

Awful ref.
Missed chances

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 9:23 pm
by thegentlegiant
DawZi wrote:positives

Mullin & Jevons is our best option upfront they complement each other

Wainwright's to say he's right footed his left-foot as improved so much and can now go either way round a fullback

oh and 3 points


negatives

subtitutions, when we was 2 up we could have rested some legs and brought fresh ones on



I think Sammy got the subs bang on this time why change the team to much while we are comfortable and 2 nil, yep some times it don't work but this time it did fair play to sammy!!

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 9:33 pm
by Caged Lion
Positives
Valuable win
Stanners splattering the ref
Roche made a few fantastic saves
Haining
Wing play
Better link up play, through balls
Mullin winning headers and holding the ball

Negatives
The cold

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 9:48 pm
by parkyboy
Use of todays sub was the right thing to do in most peoples eyes but we had 7 subs plus 4/5 others so how many of them are going to still be with us next season bearing in mind the non selection of them this season

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:46 am
by George Dawes
let me explain my comment about substitutions


unless your not aware we have a match on Tuesday night


and Darlington with 15/20mins? to go did not have 2 goals in them to level it


so why not introduce Hunter Panther Twiss for some key players who SM will start on Tuesday

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 9:35 am
by Burnley Shrimp
DawZi wrote:let me explain my comment about substitutions


unless your not aware we have a match on Tuesday night


and Darlington with 15/20mins? to go did not have 2 goals in them to level it


so why not introduce Hunter Panther Twiss for some key players who SM will start on Tuesday


Yes we were comfortable with 20 mins to go but it wouldn't be the first time when in the same situation we have made 2/3 un-enforced changes late on, lost the initiative and gone on to lose the game. A couple of notable occasions when Harvey was manager spring to mind when he did exactly that and he took an absolute slating following the loss!

Sometimes it's a case of 'if it's not broke don't try and fix it'. We needed the points desperately yesterday and Darlington weren't completely out of it. Twenty minutes should neither be here nor there for a professional athlete, particularly in a game where the pace had gone out of it. Personally I think Sammy and Mark got it absolutely spot on!

Re: SO

PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:13 pm
by Harry
Positives-

Efficient team performance throughout
Playing with 2 wingers and both threatening without the midfield becoming over-run
Number of chances created
Grizzly Adams returning from the Brazilian soccer school

Negatives-

Missing simple chances - Jevons could have had a hat trick
Wasteful dead-ball situations
Lack of atmosphere despite being 2-0 up and by far the better side

Re: SO

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:42 am
by parceldave
Caged Lion wrote:Positives
Valuable win
Stanners splattering the ref
Roche made a few fantastic saves
Haining
Wing play
Better link up play, through balls
Mullin winning headers and holding the ball

Negatives
The cold


Positives
Txts from UK that we had scored
3pts
Great Meal
She Paid
Some Good Dark Beer

Negatives
No Changes after some poor Games
Missing Burton Game Too (but she' worth it ) :P
Bloody Freezin (-19 Sat Night)

Re: SO

PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:53 pm
by bigreddog
Positives:

Clean sheet

Brilliant work rate

some fabulous performances ( esp Will)

3 Points

Negatives:

All Darlington's