campdave wrote:The thread title suggests he will, the content suggests speculation.
campdave wrote:So are you saying he will play, or just guessing?
The thread title suggests he will, the content suggests speculation.
Christies Child wrote:
......which ever way you want to read it is OK by me.....![]()
![]()
HeyshamShrimper wrote:Curtis is not a defender, you are not going to get the best out of him playing there.
--------------Smith--------------
Mcstay---Parish---Bentley---Wilson
------------Drummond------------
--------Hunter-----Craney--------
--Duffy---------------------Twiss---
--------------Jevons----------------
With Drummond sitting infront of the defence and twiss and duffy in a more advanced role could get the best out of the team
HeyshamShrimper wrote:Thinking about it i probley would have Stanley instead of Hunteralso was wondering about 1 or 2 upfront but chose one
parceldave wrote:HeyshamShrimper wrote:Thinking about it i probley would have Stanley instead of Hunteralso was wondering about 1 or 2 upfront but chose one
Not a chance , Gary Hunter has been our most consistant player recently and definately the best player last Saturday . If anybody shouls make way for Stanley then it should be Craney , who did absolutely nothing on Saturday. I think we might see Wainwright back in the fold too,
............Smith .............
Moss.....Parrish ...Bently .....Wilson
Wainy.......Hunter .....Drummy....Twissy
...............Jevons..... Mullin
SUBS To Be Used
Mcstay, Stanley,Curtis.
When we lose our stamina in secong half.
steve mfc wrote:...................................smith...............................
.....................parrish.....bentley......mcstay........
wainwright.....................................................wilson
...................................hunter...........................
.................stanley........................drummond........
.....................craney.....................jevons..........
DawZi wrote:parceldave wrote:HeyshamShrimper wrote:Thinking about it i probley would have Stanley instead of Hunteralso was wondering about 1 or 2 upfront but chose one
Not a chance , Gary Hunter has been our most consistant player recently and definately the best player last Saturday . If anybody shouls make way for Stanley then it should be Craney , who did absolutely nothing on Saturday. I think we might see Wainwright back in the fold too,
............Smith .............
Moss.....Parrish ...Bently .....Wilson
Wainy.......Hunter .....Drummy....Twissy
...............Jevons..... Mullin
SUBS To Be Used
Mcstay, Stanley,Curtis.
When we lose our stamina in secong half.
with all due respect Hunter as been playing effective at right-wing back and not central midfield
and where Hunter likes to play deep and break up attacks Drummond of late as been playing the holding role in midfield, and was MoM last week
With all due respect , he played in centre-midfield on Saturday and Duffy was the wing back . Over the 90 mins i thought Hunter was M.o.M. and Craney did nothing hardly. Looking at some of your posts on other threads , i thought it was your preference to go 4-4-2.
parceldave wrote:When we lose our stamina in secong half.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests