Shrimpsvoices

I was going to post something positive but i just cant think of anything to be positve about after that mauling, but i suppose Campdave and Dawzi will have something to say ???????

Were you there today ?

Andy wrote:Were you there today ?

IF he had been there would the result have been different

No maybe not, but although the result suggests we got a mauling we did play some good football and could have gone in at half time 3-1 up.

So what? It's the result that matters, not what we should have done.

Marky.
Whilst I agree with you the result matters, I do disagree with <<< people>>> who moan, we played some good football and as I mentioned in a previous post we could have gone in at half time 3-1 up, if we keep playing attacking football as per 1st half we'll be fine, we had to chase the game shortly after the break and we were sometimes exposed BUT hey we kept bloody trying, did you see the 90mins ? I did.

Do you know, i get sick of reading posts that say, we should have, we could have, if only and the best one's are, we'll be alright when we play the "so called lesser" teams, and if we keep on attacking teams like we do we'll beat lots of teams. Have a look at how many games we have won over the past 20 or so games !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Andy
No i didnt see the 90 mins but i did see the result,and when your at the bottom of the league its results that matter

i think people will see this as quite an unexpected hammering because we were doing reasonably well lately,although we havn't moved up the table with so many draws.if we were going to get thrashed we thought it would be by the teams at the top and alhough we might have played ok you can expect people to have a bit of a moan thats the nature of football fans.

Same old story, missed chances ,defensive mistakes, subs might as well have been at home cos as we know they nrver get the chance to change things

nothing new got some good chances we jsut din't put them away