Shrimpsvoices

they said Twiss missed a good chance to get the winner when it was Mullin's header at the death



and i wont say his name but a certain left-back was at fault for maybe two of them goals

DawZi wrote:they said Twiss missed a good chance to get the winner when it was Mullin's header at the death



and i wont say his name but a certain left-back was at fault for maybe two of them goals

And quite a few quoted on another post that Mossy was to blame for Rochdale's goals .From that video evidence he wasn't to blame for any , their first goal was down to a poor challenge from a midfieder who had just had a poor shot and should have wrapped the game up.

If you look at the goals we conceeded, the first was a result of a slice by Drummond, the second Adams got outjumped (to be fair by a far taller man) from a corner, and the equaliser, despite a great finish, came after our central defence failed to clear the ball at least 3 times.

For me, Moss was largely blameless.

i, for one, stated that Mossy was out of position on numerous occasions and that the central defenders were being pulled out wide to cover. I stand by my comments, but accept he wasn't at fault for any of the goals.

i said on a previous thread

if he can sort both full-back positions out am sure will push up the table, this is where ALL the trouble is starting from




everything else in the team looks positive, cant complain..

Artell & Bentley are a good partnership

cragbankshrimp wrote:i, for one, stated that Mossy was out of position on numerous occasions and that the central defenders were being pulled out wide to cover. I stand by my comments, but accept he wasn't at fault for any of the goals.

I agree. Moss gave them loads of space down his flank in the second half but it was Adams who was responsible for two of their goals. Especially the third - he had it right at his feet but failed to get it clear. IMO, Artell or Bentley would have got it away in that situation.

If it were up to me, I'd rest Adams but the only other left back we have is Wilson who is, IMO, wasted if not played further forward than left back.

DawZi wrote:i said on a previous thread

if he can sort both full-back positions out am sure will push up the table, this is where ALL the trouble is starting from




everything else in the team looks positive, cant complain..

Artell & Bentley are a good partnership

Not at the moment they're not , Jimbo is way below Par and defo not playing as a partner ship apart from standing next to each other and ball watching when they should be closing someone down .

DawZi wrote:they said Twiss missed a good chance to get the winner when it was Mullin's header at the death

Twiss had a good chance near the end too, and shot just wide

Arsene Wenger did'nt kick his water bottle as hard as Sammy and ended up watching from the stand instead

Maybe a good job the final whistle had already gone

Artel & Bentley cant cope with anyone that has pace

Abbo wrote:Artel & Bentley cant cope with anyone that has pace

they can't cope with anyone who has pace

heysham_mfc wrote:

Abbo wrote:Artel & Bentley cant cope with anyone that has pace

they can't cope with anyone who has pace

They can't cope with anyone who has pace.

morecambe mick wrote:

heysham_mfc wrote:

Abbo wrote:Artel & Bentley cant cope with anyone that has pace

they can't cope with anyone who has pace

They can't cope with anyone who has pace.

they can't cope with anyone who has pace.

morecambe mick wrote:

heysham_mfc wrote:

Abbo wrote:
they can't cope with anyone who has pace

They can't cope with anyone who has pace.

they can't cope with anyone who has pace.

ellos no pueden enfrentarse con nadie que tiene ritmo.


Consider yourselves trumped

Err, not really.
Replacing the players names with "they" at the start of a sentence, should therefore begin with a capitol.