Tommo wrote:This is ever present with the government trying to cut back the compensation given to injured personnel on tour.
I'll donate and I fully support our troops in Afghanistan and the incredible work they're doing.
One small point and I'm not looking to defend the government - the war in Iraq was based on a lie and is still one of the most contemptible things any government has ever done.
However there is no evidence that the government is trying to cut compensation given to personnel injured on tour. I hate quoting the Daily Express but here's the article.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/118 ... ine-troops. As the article states the two soldiers were awarded compensation in line with current agreements (which in my view are ridiculously low). They then appealed and got four times more compensation. The Ministry of Defence then challenged the appeal amount because the claim related to complications which occured later. As Simon Weston, says, "it's car crash politics to challenge those compensation claims", and he's right. As the government now say, the MOD was looking for clarity in compensation and as a result they're made the decision to increase compensation for troops injured in combat. However, and rightly so, they've decided to review the entire system to ensure that troops are more fairly and more justly treated when suffering serious combat injuries.
The government are a very easy target but sometime unjustly as papers like The Daily Mail and Daily Telegraph, in this case, play politics too and also fast and loose with the truth.