sgt major wrote:P/T Indie wrote:Ineed he is I think he could have still done a job for us as we are looking a bit light on the left back/wing back position
Absolutely Phil - why he was released in the first place is beyond me
Surprised by that, Mick. I'd have thought it was pretty understandable.
He had been out injured for a long time.
Andy Parrish still has a year on his contract so we either keep him as cover for Danny or we pay him off (which costs money).
You may say you'd prefer Micky to him but that's irrelevant, it's all about who's on a contract and who isn't. Would you gamble on paying a few grand to release Parrish then putting Micky on a contract (which has to be paid), with his injury record? I wouldn't.
I liked Micky H but I wouldn't choose him instead of Danny Adams and when you have to work to a budget, something has to give.