redrobo wrote:Are we able to appeal the red card?
Keith wrote:Watch it again, ignoring Angol's foot, watch his arm. I think that's what the ref gave. Still very soft, but could [harshly] be interpreted as 'violent', so even if we appeal, they will probably side with the ref... ...again. Twice we've had this ref when playing at Colchester and twice we've not got to half-time with eleven players on the pitch. The last sending off was very harsh, following another Oscar nominated 'performance' by their cheating players. They know they can con this useless ref.
Billy bodger wrote:I’ve just watched the red card incident, (in slow motion).
Law 12 covers fouls and misconduct, from the list of offences that can constitute a straight Red Card I am confident in this instance, the Red Card was shown for either;
Guilty of serious foul play or Guilty of violent behaviour
I dismiss the violent behaviour, Angol and the Colchester defender were both man handling each other in the challenge and there was no deliberate intent to injure the opponent, when Angola’s arm coming came across.
I would also dismiss serious foul player that would warrant a straight Red Card, it not an uncontrolled challenge it was however very clumsy
With Angola’s challenge being very clumsy which may have caused injury within the challenge with how Angol twisted round and for that reason I think a Yellow Card was more appropriate in relation to the incident.
Let’s hope other see it that way, we were robbed of playing the second half with 11men.
Old Man Kensey wrote:Having watched it back a few times I think that the EFL will back the ref.
It is a very soft red card, in my opinion its a clumsy yellow at best.
lancaster shrimp wrote:Slightly o/t but did anyone see Martinez jump in with his foot yesterday in the Man Utd game? And.... Not even get booked.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests