Red card

Red card

Postby redrobo » Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:06 pm

Are we able to appeal the red card?
redrobo
 
Posts: 6040
Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 10:23 am

Re: Red card

Postby Born again Bill » Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:10 pm

redrobo wrote:Are we able to appeal the red card?


Can we afford to appeal it ?
Born again Bill
 
Posts: 1869
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 12:11 pm

Re: Red card

Postby Keith » Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:23 pm

Watch it again, ignoring Angol's foot, watch his arm. I think that's what the ref gave. Still very soft, but could [harshly] be interpreted as 'violent', so even if we appeal, they will probably side with the ref... ...again. Twice we've had this ref when playing at Colchester and twice we've not got to half-time with eleven players on the pitch. The last sending off was very harsh, following another Oscar nominated 'performance' by their cheating players. They know they can con this useless ref.
“Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice - stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Ed Miliband: ".

David Cameron. May 4th 2015.
So how did that work out then?
User avatar
Keith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23157
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: Red card

Postby lancaster shrimp » Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:33 pm

Keith wrote:Watch it again, ignoring Angol's foot, watch his arm. I think that's what the ref gave. Still very soft, but could [harshly] be interpreted as 'violent', so even if we appeal, they will probably side with the ref... ...again. Twice we've had this ref when playing at Colchester and twice we've not got to half-time with eleven players on the pitch. The last sending off was very harsh, following another Oscar nominated 'performance' by their cheating players. They know they can con this useless ref.


Thing is though. We never get that decision in a month of Sundays.
lancaster shrimp
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:26 pm

Re: Red card

Postby Hodgie1978 » Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:53 pm

We'd have to give evidence as to why the ref got it wrong.
Soft but I don't think they will overturn it.
Hodgie1978
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2022 8:44 am

Re: Red card

Postby redrobo » Sat Jan 25, 2025 7:53 pm

Last?season I was given a verbal warning for having a pop at their manager who accused me of saying inflammatory remarks about him and his players I denied it and was supported by those around me including a foemwe Director.

Sounds to me he and his players are continuing with their play acting etc. Maybe we are too soft and should get up to speed with the dark arts
redrobo
 
Posts: 6040
Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 10:23 am

Re: Red card

Postby Redalert1970 » Sat Jan 25, 2025 8:11 pm

Derek said in his interview that it costs £500 to appeal

Hope he gets the money to do it
Redalert1970
 
Posts: 4786
Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 3:27 am

Re: Red card

Postby marky No.1 » Sun Jan 26, 2025 6:20 pm

We've appealed, last throw of the dice
Enjoy yourself.... It is later than you think
User avatar
marky No.1
 
Posts: 22496
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Carnforth

Re: Red card

Postby Billy bodger » Sun Jan 26, 2025 8:22 pm

I’ve just watched the red card incident, (in slow motion).

Law 12 covers fouls and misconduct, from the list of offences that can constitute a straight Red Card I am confident in this instance, the Red Card was shown for either;

Guilty of serious foul play or Guilty of violent behaviour

I dismiss the violent behaviour, Angol and the Colchester defender were both man handling each other in the challenge and there was no deliberate intent to injure the opponent, when Angola’s arm coming came across.

I would also dismiss serious foul player that would warrant a straight Red Card, it not an uncontrolled challenge it was however very clumsy

With Angola’s challenge being very clumsy which may have caused injury within the challenge with how Angol twisted round and for that reason I think a Yellow Card was more appropriate in relation to the incident.

Let’s hope other see it that way, we were robbed of playing the second half with 11men.
Billy bodger
 
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2023 5:09 pm

Re: Red card

Postby black morse » Sun Jan 26, 2025 8:45 pm

Billy bodger wrote:I’ve just watched the red card incident, (in slow motion).

Law 12 covers fouls and misconduct, from the list of offences that can constitute a straight Red Card I am confident in this instance, the Red Card was shown for either;

Guilty of serious foul play or Guilty of violent behaviour

I dismiss the violent behaviour, Angol and the Colchester defender were both man handling each other in the challenge and there was no deliberate intent to injure the opponent, when Angola’s arm coming came across.

I would also dismiss serious foul player that would warrant a straight Red Card, it not an uncontrolled challenge it was however very clumsy

With Angola’s challenge being very clumsy which may have caused injury within the challenge with how Angol twisted round and for that reason I think a Yellow Card was more appropriate in relation to the incident.

Let’s hope other see it that way, we were robbed of playing the second half with 11men.


I think anyone watching that in slow motion would agree with you. There was contact but no intent. My worry is that they will defend the referee instead of going with the line that we all make mistakes and the ref has made one here. Let us see whether they will make the fair decision.
black morse
 
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:59 am
Location: South Devon

Re: Red card

Postby redrobo » Sun Jan 26, 2025 9:06 pm

Unfortunately the reaction of their player probly favours the sending off is confirmed. Once again their manager has employed tactics that encourage such events. Dark arts at their worst for me.
redrobo
 
Posts: 6040
Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 10:23 am

Re: Red card

Postby Billy bodger » Sun Jan 26, 2025 9:56 pm

Just read on Morecambe FC OWS it was a straight Red Card for Violent Conduct.

The flaying arm must have been judged deliberate by the referee

The definition of Violent Conduct is when a player uses excessive force or brutality against another person regardless of whether contact is made:-

Using excessive force against an opponent, teammate, spectator or official.

Deliberately striking an opponent on the head or face.

Charging, jumping at, or tackling an opponent in a reckless manner

Attempting to trip an opponent.

I’ve put what I think, a yellow for me. (If Angol struck the opponent was it deliberate?).

We will see what happens.
Billy bodger
 
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2023 5:09 pm

Re: Red card

Postby fulwoodshrimp » Mon Jan 27, 2025 8:51 am

I thought it was a very harsh decision from a poor referee who has form against us so I asked a friend- a Portsmouth supporter and he said he thought it was a definite sending off. Lets see what the decision is.
fulwoodshrimp
 
Posts: 1239
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:28 pm

Re: Red card

Postby black morse » Mon Jan 27, 2025 9:06 am

If that's a sending off offence, for a contact sport, that is a very low threshold. They'll be stopping players from touching each other soon. I was all for stopping all the arguing with the ref but physical contact is inevitable. It should all come down to 'intension' and if anyone thinks Angol intended to elbow the guy I'd be surprised, he was merely trying to reach the ball.
black morse
 
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:59 am
Location: South Devon

Re: Red card

Postby Old Man Kensey » Mon Jan 27, 2025 10:01 am

Having watched it back a few times I think that the EFL will back the ref.
It is a very soft red card, in my opinion its a clumsy yellow at best.
On a machine like this
Everybody gets their hands oily
User avatar
Old Man Kensey
 
Posts: 919
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:31 am

Re: Red card

Postby Billy bodger » Mon Jan 27, 2025 10:15 am

Old Man Kensey wrote:Having watched it back a few times I think that the EFL will back the ref.
It is a very soft red card, in my opinion its a clumsy yellow at best.


I’m not so sure after some of the comments, I afraid you could be right, just back the ref!!
Billy bodger
 
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2023 5:09 pm

Re: Red card

Postby Keith » Mon Jan 27, 2025 10:25 am

I hope they see it as an error, but as I said elsewhere, I reckon it will come down to the ref. If he watches it back and agrees he made a mistake, then it will be over turned. If he says he still thinks it was reckless and dangerous/violent, then the FA will back him. He prefers us to play with ten men, so I reckon he'll say he was correct. :cry: :cry: :cry:

Hope for common sense from the FA.... Yeah, right.
“Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice - stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Ed Miliband: ".

David Cameron. May 4th 2015.
So how did that work out then?
User avatar
Keith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23157
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: Red card

Postby lancaster shrimp » Mon Jan 27, 2025 10:50 am

Slightly o/t but did anyone see Martinez jump in with his foot yesterday in the Man Utd game? And.... Not even get booked.
lancaster shrimp
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:26 pm

Re: Red card

Postby Old Man Kensey » Mon Jan 27, 2025 10:56 am

lancaster shrimp wrote:Slightly o/t but did anyone see Martinez jump in with his foot yesterday in the Man Utd game? And.... Not even get booked.


The worse one for me at the weekend was the foul on Endo in the Liverpool game. That was high and dangerous but VAR didn't see anything wrong with it.

And yet Angol is sent from the pitch for a little clumsy tackle.
On a machine like this
Everybody gets their hands oily
User avatar
Old Man Kensey
 
Posts: 919
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:31 am

Re: Red card

Postby CityShrimp » Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:13 pm

My feeling is that the ref sent him off because he mistakenly thought that Angol had kicked their player in the face. On the day it would never have been a red if the ref saw it properly.
CityShrimp
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:03 pm

Re: Red card

Postby Billy bodger » Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:31 pm

I’ve just read how a FA Regulatory Commission reviews an appeal against a straight Red Card.

They will read the Referees report and the appeal by the Player and the Club.

They also take into account video evidence, with the primary consideration being the severity of the foul.
(Hopefully that is one of the key factors that may help Angol?)

They also from the video evidence try to gage the intent in the challenge.
(Hopefully they see it as very clumsy, with little or no intent).

Mistaken identity. (Non).

Aggravating Factors
Previous history of foul play or targeting an opponent can lead to harsher punishment. (Unknown??)

Mitigating Factors
Remorse, the incident more of a mistimed challenge than malicious intent. (Clumsy, awkward!!)

Overall 50/50 it will be down graded to a Yellow. We will see.
Billy bodger
 
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2023 5:09 pm

Re: Red card

Postby Billy bodger » Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:27 pm

Well let’s see if Derek is right when the panel that sits tonight if they think the referee can see around 5 players between him and the incident from 30yds away, while the linesman a few yrds away did not see the incident! It was a straight decision from the referee.
Billy bodger
 
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2023 5:09 pm

Re: Red card

Postby Redalert1970 » Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:03 pm

Appeal as FAILED

What a surprise

Yet another kick in the teeth for the club

We can't take much more
Redalert1970
 
Posts: 4786
Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 3:27 am

Re: Red card

Postby Born again Bill » Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:12 pm

I have said it before and I will keep saying it , the EFL want us out of the league , we are an embarrassment to them !!!!!!
Born again Bill
 
Posts: 1869
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 12:11 pm

Re: Red card

Postby Old Man Kensey » Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:15 pm

What a surprise.
On a machine like this
Everybody gets their hands oily
User avatar
Old Man Kensey
 
Posts: 919
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:31 am

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests