jbc.shrimp wrote:Whittingham will only sell if he gets at least the value of his investment. At the moment that is sinking fast. I doubt the club is worth what he actually put in, so no the sale will not be happening any tjmee soon.
Billy bodger wrote:e prospective buyers cannot pass the EFL Test but the rules for taking over a National League side are weaker and the prospective buyers will therefore have a better chance of buying Morecambe FC, if Morecambe FC are relegated.
black morse wrote:If Jason and Momi want us to go down why did one or both of them supply Derek with money to buy players in Jan window?
black morse wrote:I'm sure that Derek said in one of his interviews he'd been given money (from Jason?) for new players. Mind you I don't know if that was just"promised" money! That's happened before
redrobo wrote:I spoke to one of our Co Chairman prior to yesterday's match and I'm more than happy to believe what I was told in our face to face conversation.
Fans need to understand that certain information about certain matters concerning our club and the club's sale needs to be kept confidential as are the details of our on going communication with the EFL.
We may not like it but that is the way it has to be. Not everything in the running of our club's business can be (or should be) made public. You wouldn't expect that in the greater business world so why should a football club which is a business be any different....![]()
![]()
![]()
Keith wrote:Was the information given to you the same as the information that we all already know or something different?
Keith wrote:redrobo wrote:I spoke to one of our Co Chairman prior to yesterday's match and I'm more than happy to believe what I was told in our face to face conversation.
Fans need to understand that certain information about certain matters concerning our club and the club's sale needs to be kept confidential as are the details of our on going communication with the EFL.
We may not like it but that is the way it has to be. Not everything in the running of our club's business can be (or should be) made public. You wouldn't expect that in the greater business world so why should a football club which is a business be any different....![]()
![]()
![]()
Was the information given to you the same as the information that we all already know or something different?
A football club IS different, we're not "customers" we are fans. How many times have you, yourself written "OUR CLUB"? Obviously, some aspects of a deal need to remain confidential. But perhaps if the club had been more open in the past, we wouldn't be in the same mess that we're in now? Lemos, Cala... Bond Group...
redrobo wrote:Someone has bought £168,000 worth of shares in our club.
Confirmation can be found on the Company House site so your claim that no money is available contradicts that of Company House
Whether the whole of that in addition to that obtained thanks to numerous cup wins will be made available only time will tell but I have faith in out BoDs to do what they can to provide DA with the necessary funds to bring in new talent.
I spoke to one of our Co Chairman prior to yesterday's match and I'm more than happy to believe what I was told in our face to face conversation.
Fans need to understand that certain information about certain matters concerning our club and the club's sale needs to be kept confidential as are the details of our on going communication with the EFL.
We may not like it but that is the way it has to be. Not everything in the running of our club's business can be (or should be) made public. You wouldn't expect that in the greater business world so why should a football club which is a business be any different....![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm a shareholder in our club and I would not expect every deal or conversation concerning the running of my club (especially matters concerning tax affairs) to be made available to me and other shareholders.
I'd be interested to know why certain fans feel differently...![]()
![]()
.
Keith wrote:I would like to see a weekly update by the directors, even if there is nothing new to tell us. Perhaps with fans emailing questions. Some questions may be answered with "unfortunately we can't answer that for legal reasons" , or "confidentiality". Even 'non information' will help to fill the vacuum. It's the vacuum of information that leads to problems.
Keith wrote:I would like to see a weekly update by the directors, even if there is nothing new to tell us. Perhaps with fans emailing questions. Some questions may be answered with "unfortunately we can't answer that for legal reasons" , or "confidentiality". Even 'non information' will help to fill the vacuum. It's the vacuum of information that leads to problems.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests