I've often wondered if Whittingham remaining utterly unrealistic is a hangover from the Sarbjot debacle? Sarbjot made a fantasy offer, and Whittingham has held this as the target, because he believed Sarbjot's valuation. As a result, he's never entertained realistic offers?
Keith wrote:I've often wondered if Whittingham remaining utterly unrealistic is a hangover from the Sarbjot debacle? Sarbjot made a fantasy offer, and Whittingham has held this as the target, because he believed Sarbjot's valuation. As a result, he's never entertained realistic offers?
Completely guessing that. And it would suggest that Whittingham was a completely deranged numpty, rather than the astute businessman he surely is...
Keith wrote:I've often wondered if Whittingham remaining utterly unrealistic is a hangover from the Sarbjot debacle? Sarbjot made a fantasy offer, and Whittingham has held this as the target, because he believed Sarbjot's valuation. As a result, he's never entertained realistic offers?
KenH wrote:Keith wrote:I've often wondered if Whittingham remaining utterly unrealistic is a hangover from the Sarbjot debacle? Sarbjot made a fantasy offer, and Whittingham has held this as the target, because he believed Sarbjot's valuation. As a result, he's never entertained realistic offers?
Very easy to get sucked down that rabbit hole. Lots of business owners "fall" for unrealistic valuations given by business brokers to basically con them into signing up and paying upfront selling fees, they then can't face reducing asking prices as they see it as "losing" money.
Same happens with home owners who get suckered in by unrealistic estate agents who give stupidly high valuations, and likewise see any reduction as "losing" money.
The thing is people who get suckered like that can end up "losing" even more if they never sell their business at all, or end up chasing a falling market.
KenH wrote:Keith wrote:I've often wondered if Whittingham remaining utterly unrealistic is a hangover from the Sarbjot debacle? Sarbjot made a fantasy offer, and Whittingham has held this as the target, because he believed Sarbjot's valuation. As a result, he's never entertained realistic offers?
Very easy to get sucked down that rabbit hole. Lots of business owners "fall" for unrealistic valuations given by business brokers to basically con them into signing up and paying upfront selling fees, they then can't face reducing asking prices as they see it as "losing" money.
Same happens with home owners who get suckered in by unrealistic estate agents who give stupidly high valuations, and likewise see any reduction as "losing" money.
The thing is people who get suckered like that can end up "losing" even more if they never sell their business at all, or end up chasing a falling market.
KenH wrote:[
Same happens with home owners who get suckered in by unrealistic estate agents who give stupidly high valuations, and likewise see any reduction as "losing" money.
The thing is people who get suckered like that can end up "losing" even more if they never sell their business at all, or end up chasing a falling market.
redrobo wrote:If the club go into Administration does he have to call for that or can the current BoDs do it without his permission...![]()
![]()
redrobo wrote:I still believe that there is a local business Consortium ( including former Directors![]()
) waiting in the wings but Jason seems unprepared to discuss a reasonable offer for his shares with them or anybody else.
If the club go into Administration does he have to call for that or can the current BoDs do it without his permission...![]()
![]()
Argumentative wrote:For me if the local consortium of business people would be best option for our club and I would hope they would bring in the fans by letting them also have a share of owning their Club.
Oh Billy don’t mention this as Keith will scorn you as when I mentioned this I was talking bollocks.
Still a good idea better than Keith’s stroll along the prom.
To quote Keith.
How did that work out then.
P/T Indie wrote:If we went into administration would that mean that all directors would then be blacklisted from being a director in the future?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 62 guests