Shrimpsvoices

Freez wrote:Mustafa's here we come!!

FTFY

Mr spud you must be losing your memory, I saw and heard you a few years ago stood on the berlin wall,think it was a night game!Did you miss your prawn sandwiches on Saturday?

Credit where it's due - I thought Cambridge had done their homework and knew our frailties. From the off they were trying to attack down our left, and often had 2 men on Phillips. Fortunately for us, they didn't have the quality to back up the plan, otherwise it could have been a disastrous day at the office.

I don't think Slew is quite game-ready yet, but I also don't feel he warrants the stick he's getting. I'd love to see a heat map of where he was on the pitch on Saturday, as he seemed to be a second LB rather than playing as a winger. The goal showed what he can do - cut inside, beat a man and then create something of danger in the box. If he could spend more time doing that rather than assisting Conlan, I think we'd see more of what DA sees.

Our left side is much less of an issue, when Carlos is over there, tracking back to give Conlan some cover, which he does really well. Carlos does many things well I suppose.

Slanester wrote:Our left side is much less of an issue, when Carlos is over there, tracking back to give Conlan some cover, which he does really well. Carlos does many things well I suppose.

It's still the same problem though, surely? The issue isn't the winger tracking back, it's the LB who constantly needs cover to do their own job...

Ntini wrote:

Slanester wrote:Our left side is much less of an issue, when Carlos is over there, tracking back to give Conlan some cover, which he does really well. Carlos does many things well I suppose.

It's still the same problem though, surely? The issue isn't the winger tracking back, it's the LB who constantly needs cover to do their own job...

Yes sure N. My point is, that as a combination, LC and CMG, are much “safer” than LC and JS. If the funds are available? The correct player available? Then a new LB, could hopefully strengthen that position. If not, then at least we have the ammo to help ourselves.

I would like to see Cranston given a chance at left back

Isn't Cranston on the list of players DA doesn't want?

Cranston used to be voted MOTM regularly, but then his performances seemed to drop off until he was no longer selected for the starting 11, and then finally dropped altogether. Not sure why.....

al1 wrote:I would like to see Cranston given a chance at left back

Agreed. Conlon always looks vulnerable and a weakness. Great therefore to see Cranny back in the side for tonight's game v Walsall. Let's hope he keeps his head! Full-back is not his best position, we know, but well done to DA for giving him another go!

Sky saying final whistle Walsall 0 Morecambe 2 as does OWS.

Calderwood sacked