Shrimpsvoices

I THINK WE SHOULD PLAY 4-4-2

ROCHE
YATES McSTAY BENTLY McGIVERN

STANLEY FRAZER DRUMMOND WAINWRIGHT

CURTIS HOWE

personally i would keep the same formation as last two games but change taylor for curtis .....bring taylor off bench for last twenty minutes when opposition defences are starting to get tired...

I'd say keep the same as the past 2 games, maybe swapping Artell for Adams.

IMO Taylor wouldn't have the same effect coming off the bench as Curtis does.

Same team as tues except CURTIS FOR TAYLOR

I'd keep the same formation as the last two matches, at least it allows us some width.

campdave wrote:I'd keep the same formation as the last two matches, at least it allows us some width.

At last.....we are in agreement about something!

IF however, Sammy is able to do a deal with a loanee striker I'd have him in place of Taylor and let Taylor have say 20 minutes later on.

Christies Child wrote:
At last.....we are in agreement about something!

It's not the first time, and I'm sure it doesn't need pointed out everytime it happens.

campdave wrote:I'm sure it doesn't need pointed out everytime it happens.

Don't worry Dave, no need to be embarrassed and we don't think any less of you when it does!

What formation are we playing at the minute? It seems like an aggressive mish mash where anybody who fancies a run upfield scampers off until they are challenged, and anybody who feels like defending sort of tracks back with an opposition player.

Don't mind much because it is entertaining.

Same team as Tuesday, but bring Waynaldo on earlier to stand a chance of scoring his 2 goals.

3 5 2

Like some of the others i'd change young Taylor for Wayne and leave the rest as is, Frazer was outstanding and good to see him back

....................TEAM FOR ALDERSHOT..............................
...................................ROACH......................................................

....YATES......MCSTAY......BENTELY ......ARTELL.....PARRISH....

...............STANLEY..............DRUMMOND..........mcgivern.......

..................................curtis............howe.........................

I am of exactly the same opinion as Mr Howe magic.

The team being positive from the off and playing collectively as we all know they can.

Sod being cautious for the first 20. Up and at 'em and let's get a 2 goal lead. Then we'll see the flowing football we've come to expect from the lads.

Enough of the negative vibes (from me? ).

The best form of defence is ATTACK!

the team will be

ROCHE
YATES McSTAY BENTLEY Artell Adams
Stanley Drummond McGIVERN Curtis
Howe

philbigmfcfan wrote:the team will be

ROCHE
YATES McSTAY BENTLEY Artell Adams
Stanley Drummond McGIVERN Curtis
Howe

I won't be too happy if we play that formation at home, 5-4-1 are you serious

Curtis in for Taylor would be the only change i would make, it would be nice to bring Taylor into games when we are a couple of goals up to give him the experience without as much pressure being placed upon him, unfortunately that doesn't look like happening.

We certainly have looked a better side playing with wing backs, my only concern is both Yates and McGivern have to choose their moments to get forward and equally know when to get back, late on in the game on Tuesday we lost possession several times with Ryan pushed well up on the left hand side this left a large space for Accy to run into giving them a 2 or 3 on 1 situation, we got away with it but a better side with quicker players would have punished us.

As Ryan has said he has learned a lot already, he certainly has the ability and given time will get better at playing this role, hopefully we can extend the loan until the end of the season.

It's amazing to think the playing an extra defender has created a better attacking threat. Doesn't seem right, really. But if it's working then stick with it. It it was me I'd bring Parrish in for Adams.