Shrimpsvoices

I know they often get it wrong, but the BBC sport website says that Jimbo has made 249 appearances for Morecambe...That would make Saturday 250...Is this/are they correct?

Also Stato's out there, who has made the most appearances for Morecambe?

According to Lincoln Citys match programme on Saturday Jim Bentley had made 218 appearances so i dont know which one is right...... I also know Wayne Curtis is pushing towards 250 appearances for the club as well Dont know if i am right but Dave Mckearney made 288 appearances for the club and i think he could be the record

i think steve done holds the record number of appearances

JIMBO!
I stand to be corrected BUT I think it is as follows;

LEAGUE 219
FA CUP 9
LEAGUE CUP 4
OTHER COMPETITIONS 17
GOALS = 27 in all
Total Games for Morecambe to date = 249

249 looks right

http://www.soccerbase.com/players_detai ... ayerid=621

According to club records 264 plus 1 used sub and 4 un-used sub.27 goals.Averaging over 40 games a season.Well done Jimbo.

Mick is correct

Jim Bentley Played 264 games could have played a possible 328 so started 80.49% of total possible games goals scored = 27

Wayne Curtis on 88 goals from 228 games and 88 used sub apps too!!!

Michael Twiss 169 games and 12 used sub apps and 60 goals from a possible 229 starts thats 73.80% of games

Shrimpsscene wrote:Mick is correct

Jim Bentley Played 264 games could have played a possible 328 so started 80.49% of total possible games goals scored = 27

Wayne Curtis on 88 goals from 228 games and 88 used sub apps too!!!

Michael Twiss 169 games and 12 used sub apps and 60 goals from a possible 229 starts thats 73.80% of games

Is it me? Or is this absolute bollocks?
How can 60 be 73.80% of 229

morecambe mick wrote:

Shrimpsscene wrote:Mick is correct

Jim Bentley Played 264 games could have played a possible 328 so started 80.49% of total possible games goals scored = 27

Wayne Curtis on 88 goals from 228 games and 88 used sub apps too!!!

Michael Twiss 169 games and 12 used sub apps and 60 goals from a possible 229 starts thats 73.80% of games

Is it me? Or is this absolute bollocks?
How can 60 be 73.80% of 229

It's you. The % is games appeared in versus possible appearences.

I could see what he was meaning (the third time I read it), I was pointing out that it was terribly hard to read.