Redalert1970 wrote:No one knows what the budget will be next season so yet again its all speculation
Speculation perhaps, but there is zero logical reason why the playing budget would increase, when income decreases. If Whittingham was going to invest, then surely he'd have done it this season, to maintain EFL status? Pointless him putting money in next season, if we're in the National League, as it won't be enough to bounce back. And if he does chuck money at us, I'd worry about the interest rate that we'd be paying.
Billy bodger wrote:Is it administration what is behind the ‘not a penny more’ protest in the hope it rapidly gets rid of Whittingham? That seems to be the likelihood whether it gets rid of Whittingham or with him still at the realm. I’m still convinced because of Company Law he won’t take too much of a financial hit. Please feel free to correct me.
My hope would be, with a 'Not a Penny More' campaign is, Whittingham would see the only way he could get out with a decent pay-off, would be to accept a sensible offer to sell. He'd get out and the campaign would then return to supporting the club and new owner ASAP. If he doesn't sell, then clearly, he won't be the one moving us into Administration, it would be another party that is owed money. Ultimately, it would probably be HMRC, who don't mess about. They would then be the primary creditor. The Administrator would sell for whatever they can get, but with paying HMRC the primary goal. Whatever is left, would get split between remaining creditors, such as utilities. What they'd get, I've no idea, but it certainly won't be everything he is owed.
In short, hopefully Whittingham will become motivated to sell quickly, if he sees the protest is serious.
If not, then Administration would still be better than Whittingham remaining any longer, and we could at least start planning for the future, even if it is as a phoenix club.
People doing differently, that's fine, we're in uncharted waters and supporters need to do what they believe is right.